UDC 37.09:16
https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.01-20.060
V.A. Еrovenko is Dr.Sci. (Physics & Mathematics), prof. at Belorussian State University e-mail: erovenko@bsu.by
Discussed is practical benefits of cognitive technology of “teach to study” in general mathematical education of different levels. Actuality of the research is proved by the fact, that students often inadequately estimate their knowledge of mathematics and hide at the same time their misunderstanding. Article focuses attention on difference between knowledge and it’s understanding. If creative methods of training rely on cognitive technology, then students still develop the thinking, when they reveal gaps in understanding of difficult mathematical subject.
Keywords: university mathematical education, cognitive technology of training, developing thinking.
References
1. Klarin, M.V. Cognitive and didactic researches: analysis of the problem field. Domestic and foreign pedagogics. 2017. No. 6. P. 94–103.
2. Mashinyan, A.A., Kochergina, N.V. Cognitive technology of knowledge formation in natural-science theories. Prospects of science and education. 2015. No. 3. P. 72–81.
3. Erovenko, V.A. Social process of “McDonaldization” on the example of mathematical education transformation. Alma mater (Vestnik visshei shkoly). 2019. No. 1. P. 15–19.
4. Karpova, E.V., Yablokova, A.V. Cognitive styles: background and new problems. Yaroslavl pedagogical bulletin. 2016. No. 6. P. 220–226.
5. Rozov, N.H. Profession — the teacher. Vestnik of Moscow university. 2016. No. 2. P. 3–9.