UDC 37.09::54
https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.01-20.071
Olga V. Andryushkova, Ph.D. of Chemical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Laboratory
of Methods of Teaching Chemistry of the Department of General Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry,
Lomonosov Moscow State University. E-mail: o.andryushkova@gmail.com ; Natalia L. Zvereva, Ph.D. of Chemical Sciences, Associate Professor, Faculty of Chemistry, Lomonosov Moscow State University e-mail: nataliacat@mail.ru.
Discussed are approaches to the system of evaluation of quality of emergent learning of chemical disciplines for non-chemical disciplines at university. The learning model used includes, in addition to lectures and seminars, mandatory laboratory workshop on the main sections of the course. In face-to-face training programs it is also proposed to use online support course, containing theoretical and reference materials, methodological recommendations for preparation for laboratory works, class tests, colloquiums, as well as tests on all topics for evaluation of self-preparation for classes. It is proposed to assess students’ learning achievements on the basis of calculation of integral indicator, i.e. negentropy, that takes into account all types of students’ activities, as well as external requirements to competences formation. Negentropy is calculated as the sum of all values of the criteria from first to third levels, taking into account their weights. Evaluation of criteria values is performed according to dichotomy principle or using fuzzy set algorithms.
Keywords: e-learning, combined or blended learning, emergent learning, fuzzy set, quality of learning, negentropy.
References
1. Modern digital educational space in the RF. Evaluation of quality of online-courses. URL: http://neorusedu.ru/activity/otsenka-kachestva-online-kursov
2. Tikhomirov, V.P. Methods of evaluation of quality of electronic education/ URL: http//:studydoc.ru/doc/4976682/metody-ocenki-kachestvae-lektronnogo-obucheniya-tihomirov-v.p.
3. Grinshkun, V.V., Krasnova, G.A. Evaluation of quality of electronic education: approaches, models, criteria. Vestnik MGPU. 2018. No. 1 (43). P. 16–23.
4. Andreev, A.A. Qualityofonline-education. In: Electronic education in continuous education. Ulyanovsk, 2017. P. 340–344.
5. Andryuskova, O.V., Andreev, A.A. Optimization of number criteria of quality of electronic, combined and emergent education. In: Natural scientific education: problems of evaluation of quality. Moscow, 2018. P. 206–220.
6. Arkhangelskaya, O.V., Zvereva, N.L., Kerimov, E.Yu. Rating system for evaluation of results of training at higher school. In: Actual problems of education in chemistry. Penza, 2013. P. 39–45.
7. Kabanova, E.G., Ptashkina, E.A., Andryushkova, O.V., Budanova, A.A., Zhmurko, G.P. Administration of motivation by using of elements of electronic education and ball-rating system. In: Natural scientific education: educational technologies at higher and medium school. Moscow, 2019. P. 192–207.
8. Andryushkova, O.V., Grigoriev, S.G. Calculation of negentrop and weight coefficients of many-criteria marks on the base of indistinct multitudes. Informatic and education. 2019. No. 1 (300). P. 40–49.
9. National psychological encyclopedia. URL: https://vocabulary.ru/termin/sposobnost-k-obucheniyu.html
10. Starovoytenko, E.B. Psychology of personality in paradigm of life relations. Moscow, 2004.
11. Yung, K.G. Psychological types. Moscow, 1995.
12. Shtovba, S.D. Introduction into the theory of indistinct multitudes and indistinct logic. URL: http://matlab.exponenta.ru/fuzzylogic/book1/6.php
13. Vostroknutov, I., Kaneda, Y. The Possibilities of Using Modern CASIO CG-50 Graphing Calculators for Volumetric and Complex Calculations, Including Fuzzy Calculations. 2018. Vol. 896. P. 702–708.
14. Tsvetkov, V.Ya. Emergentisme. URL: https://applied-research.ru/ru/article/view?id=11234
.png)
