Alma Mater
ISSN 1026-955X
Vestnik Vysshey Shkoly (Higher School Herald)
The best way to learn all about Higher Education

=

Features of applying documents analysis to ideological material of modern Russia in study of It’s social structure

M.S. Kozyrev
80,00 Р

UDC 002(0.034)-042.4:316:32

https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.09-20.108           

 

M.S. Kozyrev is Cand.Sci. (Philosophy), Ass. prof. at Russian Technological University (MIREA)

 

Analyzed is methodology for the analysis of ideological documents, with which it would be possible to study the social structure of modern Russia. It takes into account peculiarities of ideological material as public text, i.e. targeting mass audience, accessibility to unlimited circle of people, thematically organized. In addition to the one indicated in the article, property of ideology to reflect social reality is postulated. It is believed that the social structure is reproduced in unrecognizable form in the ideological field. At the same time, reproduction mechanism has two aspects, i.e. firstly, occupying a certain position in the social hierarchy of classes, the agent (ideologist) will reproduce it in ideological field as well, and secondly, the struggle in the ideological field reproduces in euphemized forms economic and political struggle between classes (ruling elite seeks to impose it’s worldview on everyone else). This technique is based on synthesis of classical analysis and thematic content analysis. Four persistent and major discursive topics were highlighted, in which certain elements of the social structure are reflected Russia’s place in the world; Russia in history (in historical past), Russia in the future, Russia in the present. From the latter, two additional smaller topics stand out, i.e. “elite-mass” dichotomy and attitudes toward various social groups.

Key words: ideology, documents’ analysis, social structure.

 

Reference

  1. Burdie, P. Sociology of social space. Moscow, 2007. P. 92–95.
  2. Geertz, C. Interpretation of cultures. Moscow, 2004.
  3. Kirienko discussed with political technologists presidential company of 2018. URL: https://www.rbc.ru/politics/02/11/2016/58197f879a7947fb30361a90
  4. Kozyrev, M.S. Dichotomy “elite-masses” in publications of representatives of political party of “United Russia”. Euro-Asian juridical journal. 2017. No. 4 (107). P. 407–412.
  5. Kozyrev, M.S. Social state of “left” counter-reality in the RF (on materials of publications of representatives of KP RF). Social politic and sociology. 2019. No. 1 (130). P. 157–166.
  6. Kremlin studies recommendations by experts as to raising entrance to 2018 election. URL: https://www.vedomosti.ru/politics/articles/2017/03/24/682556-kreml-izuchaet
  7. Manheym, K. Diagnosis of our time. Moscow, 1994. P. 191–192.
  8. Marks, K., Engel, F. German ideology. Moscow, 1988.
  9. Martianov, V.S., Vakhrusheva, E.A., Kiselev, K.V., Ilchenko, M.S. and others. Russia in search of ideology: transformation of values of regulators of modern society. Moscow, 2016.
  10. Matveychev, O.A., Akopyan, A. Myths about corruption. Moscow, 2018.
  11. Modernization of social structure of Russian society. Moscow, 2008.
  12. Matvejchev leaves post of Governor of Vologda region. URL: https://www.vologda.kp.ru/online/news/772103/
  13. Radaev, V.V. Notion of capital, forms of capital and their conversion. Social sciences and modernity. 2003. No. 2. P. 20–31.
  14. Russian society and challenges of time. Moscow, 2016.
  15. Scandalized-known bloger Oleg Matveychev nominated as vice-governor of Volgograd region. URL: https://www.volgograd.kp.ru/daily/25680/839087/
  16. Tikhonova, N.E. Social stratification in modern Russia: experience in empirical analysis. Moscow, 2007.
  17. Tikhonova, N.E. Social structure of Russia: theory and reality. Moscow, 2014.
  18. Shkaratan, O.I. Sociology of non-equality. Theory and reality. Moscow, 2012.
  19. Bourdieu, P. Social Space and the Genesis of Appropriated Physical Space. International journal of urban and regional research. 2018. No. 42 (1). P. 106–114.
  20. Geertz, C. Ethos, World-View, and the Analysis of Sacred Symbols. Antioch review. 2016. No. 74 (3). P. 622–637.