UDC 130.2::7.01
https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.09-19.068
M.D. Kuparashvili is Dr.Sci. (Philosophy), prof. at Omsk State University n.a. F.M. Dostoevsky e-mail: kuparashvili@rambler.ru
Researched is the problem of post-modernism. Contrary to popular belief about negative pathos of post-modern, it is necessary to point out deep fallacy of this approach and to demonstrate evidence base for justification of different point of view. Well-known problematic body of post-modernism requires slightly different interpretation in connection with change in position of post-modern itself. The author sees in post-modern not the end of the past, but the beginning of new era, the most important points for formation of which should be considered: analysis of the situation of person and his identification, immanent uncertainty and ontological dumbness and grand textualization of everything.
Key words: modern, text, information, knowledge, identification, structuralism, post-structuralism, textualization, narrativization.
References
1. Hassan, I. URL: http://culturolog.ru/content/view/2765/
2. Scholes, R. Structuralism in literature: Introduction. New-Haven, 1974.
3. Culler, J. On deconstruction: Theory a criticism after structuralism. London, 1983.
4. Iser, W. Der Akt des Lesens: Theorie asthetischer Wirkung. Munhen, 1976.
5. Brooks, C. The well wrought turn: Studies in the structure of poetry. New York, 1947.
6. Childish, B., Thomson, Ch. Remodernism. Supplanting the Post-dernism. New York–New Delhi–Sydney. 2015.
5. Anderson, P. Origins of post-modernism. Moscow, 2011.
.png)
