UDC 316.6-052
Aleksey A. Oschepkov, Cand. Sci. (Psychology), Associate Professor, Departments of human sciences at Dimitrovgrad engineering technological Institute — branch of National research nuclear university MEPhI "Moscow Engeneering Physics Insntitute", ORCID: 0000-0003-0755-4578, e-mail: sladkod@yandex.ru
Elena N. Piskunova, Cand. Sci. (Pedagogy), Associate Professor, Departments of human sciences at Dimitrovgrad engineering-technological Institute — branch of National research nuclear university MEPhI "Moscow Engeneering Physics Insntitute", ORCID: 0000-0002-9296-3140, e-mail: piskunova-elena22@yandex.ru
Valentina B. Salakhova, Cand. Sci. (Psychology), Leading researcher at Center for Security Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, ORCID: 0000-0002-5056-6518, e-mail: valentina_nauka@mail.ru
The relevance of the study of the given problem is conditioned by transformations of social-normative structures of the modern world, generating the appearance of new forms of violence. One of such forms became the phenomenon of unmotivated attacks of pupils and students on their peers and teachers with the use of weapon, obtained the name of amok and shooting. Due to this, the given article is directed to theoretical-methodological justification of the study of amok and shooting, because the direct study of the given phenomenon is related to the restrictions of ethical character. With this in mind, the study of amok and shooting is possible on the basis of dispositional concept of personality, because it lets reveal the social-psychological projections of amok and shooting of dispositional character. The leading method of the given study became the psychological testing of systems of value orientations and resilience of personality. The sample of the study is presented by students of the age of 20–22 years of Dimitrovgrad engineering-technological institute — branch of NRNU MEPhI. Thus, it was conducted the empirical study of the features of systems of value orientations and resilience of personality of youth with high and low level of proneness to aggressive behavior. As a result, it was revealed that youth with high level of proneness to aggressive behavior has the statistically significant low mark of the component of resilience ‘Spirituality, meaning the low level of meaningfulness of own vital activity. The given result lets conduct the justified experimental study of influence of level of life meaningfulness of young people to level of proneness to aggressive behavior. In its turn, the given study will contribute to development of knowledge about phenomenon of amok and shooting and to elaboration of psychological-pedagogical technologies of school-shooting preventing.
Keywords: amok, shooting, dispositional personality system, value orientations, resilience, aggressive behavior.
References
1. Devyatkin, A.A. Phenomenon of social attitude in psychology of 20th century: monograph. Kaliningrad: Kaliningrad University Press, 1999. 309 p.
2. Karandashev V.N. Technique of Schwarz in studying of personality values: conception and methodological guide. St. Petersburg: Speach, 2004. 70 p.
3. Leontiev, D.A. Values and value ideas in individual and group consciousness: types, determinants and changes in time. Psychological review. 1998. No. 1. P. 13–25.
4. Mahnach, A.V. Studies of human resilience: basic approaches and models. In: Resilience: individual, professional and social aspects. A.V. Mahnach, L.G. Dikaya (eds.). Moscow: Institute of psychology of Russian Academy of Sciences, 2016. 755 p. P. 46–70.
5. Mahnach, A.V. Theoretical basis of methods of grades of professional’s resilience. Institute of Psychology of Russian Academy of Sciences. Organizational psychology and psychology of labor. 2017. V. 2. No. 1. P. 23–53.
6. Nesterova, A.A. Social-psychological approach to knowledge of construct ‘resilience’. In: Resilience: individual, professional and social aspects. A.V. Mahnach, L.G. Dikaya (eds.). Moscow: Institute of psychology of Russian Academy of Sciences Press, 2016. 755 p. P. 88–111.
7. Uznadze, D.N. Psychology of set. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2001. 416 p.
8. Shapar’, V.B. Applied psychology. Psycho-diagnostics of groups and collectives. Rostov n/D.: Feniks, 2006. 448 p.
9. Shihirev, P.N. Modern social psychology. Moscow: IP RAN Press, 2000. 447 p.
10. Yadov, V.A. Self-regulation and predicting of social behavior of personality: dispositional conception. Moscow: CSPiM, 2013. 376 p.
11. Bulle, N. Vygotsky versus Dewey on mental causation: The core of two divergent conceptions of human thought. New Ideas in Psychology. 2021. V. 63. DOI:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2021.100898
12. Kozachenko, H.H., Piazza, J. How children and adults value different animal lives. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2021. V. 210. DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105204
13. Rockeach, M. The nature of human values. N.Y.: Free press, 1973. 322 p.
14. Schwarz, S.H. Basic individual values: sources and consequences. In: Handbook of value. Oxford: UK, Oxford University press, 2015. 39 p.
15. The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioral Disorders. Diagnostic criteria for research. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1993. 267 p.
16. Vorauer, J.D., Petsnik, C., Quesnel, M.S. Who brings you up when you’re feeling down? Distinct implications of dispositional empathy versus situationally-prompted empathic mindsets for targets’ affective experience in face-to-face interpersonal interaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2020. V. 89. DOI:10.1016/j.jesp.2020.103991
.png)
