Alma Mater
ISSN 1026-955X
Vestnik Vysshey Shkoly (Higher School Herald)
The best way to learn all about Higher Education


Information systems of rating assessment of individual activity of teachers of higher school. Literature review

V.A. Lazarenko, V.A. Lipatov, N.B. Philinov, T.A. Oleynikova, D.A. Severinov, A.Yu. Grigoryan
80,00 Р      


V.A. Lazarenko is Dr.Sc. (Medicine), prof., rector of university; V.A. Lipatov is Dr.Sc. (Medicine), prof. at Kursk State Medical University; N.B. Philinov is Cand.Sc. (Economy), doc., dean of faculty at National Research University “Higher School of Economics”; T.A. Oleynikova is Cand.Sc. (Pharmaceutics), doc., chief of Center of quality management; D.A. Severinov is student; and A.Yu. Grigoryan is Cand.Sc. (Medicine), doc. at Kursk State Medical University




Discussed are various methodic of rating control over employees and departments of high school. The system of ranging is being introduced for estimation of quality of teaching and volume of work, done by one teacher or department, and also with the aim of stimulation of productive activity of lecturers with using of both cash or non-cash methods of encouragement. Lecturers’ rating would be interesting component of the system of university management as objective criterion for evaluation of merits of worker by conclusion with him “effective contract”. Up to nowadays there is a set of ways to evaluate individual activity of pedagogue, each of which has it’s pro’s and con’s, but universal system still isn’t developed. One of key problems of creation of necessary and meeting all requirements system of rating control is poly-factority of indicators, offered for assessment.

Key words: rating, lecturer, sub-faculty, monitoring, effectiveness, system of quality managemen.




  1. Abankina, I.V. Typology and analysis of scientific educational results of Russian high schools. Foresight, 2013, Vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 56–64.
  2. Anisimov, A.P., Melnichenko, R.G. Rating of lecturers as principal indicator by accreditation of high school. Law & education, 2011, no. 6, pp. 4–10.
  3. Arkhipova, E.N. Automatizing of rating evaluation of activity of lecturers. University management, 2010, no. 5, pp. 51–62.
  4. Arkhipova, E.N. Informational technical accompaniment of rating system of evaluation of lecturers’ activity. Territory of new possibilities, 2010, no. 3, pp. 17–27.
  5. Atlas, E.E., Ilyushenkov, B.E. Using of methods of system analysis to evaluation of quality of lecturing of clinical disciplines and elaboration of managerial solution for their removing. Izvestia of Tula state university, 2013, no. 2, pp. 3–8.
  6. Basalaeva, O.G., Basalaev, Yu.M., Sadovoy, A.N. Problems of introduction of rating system for evaluation of activity of lecturers. University management, 2006, no. 2, pp. 65–68.
  7. Belova, S.N. Objective evaluation of quality of lecturing. Scientific research in education, 2007, no. 1, pp. 14–20.
  8. Buturlakin, V.V. Improvement of quality of higher education under the context of the Bologna declaration. In: Social and political development of Russia: history, theory, practice Saratov, 2004, pp. 82–87.
  9. Vasileva, E.Yu. Approaches to evaluation of quality of activity of lecturer of high school. University management, 2006, no. 2 (42), pp. 74–78.
  10. Vasileva, E.Yu. System monitoring of quality of educational environment. University management, 2008, no. 3, pp. 24–34.
  11. Vasileva, E.Yu., Granichina, O.A., Trapitsyn, S.Yu. Rating of lecturers, faculties and sub-faculties in high school. St. Petersburg, 2007, pp. 54–63.
  12. Glyon declaration. Glyon colloquium, May, 1998, Swiss.
  13. Gmar, D.V., Kryukov, V.V., Sakhgeldyan, K.I. System of electronic document circulation of high school. In: New information technologies and management of quality. Turkey, 2010, pp. 64–66.
  14. Gorodentseva, T.A. Picture of high schools in the light of data from both structured and non-structured sources. Moscow, 2012, pp. 297–303.
  15. Grinenko, S.V. Evaluation of effectiveness of high school activity under modern conditions. In: Actual problems of economics, management and law. Taganrog, 2004, p. 39.
  16. Zelenev, I.A., Tumanov, S.V. On evaluation of quality of lecturing at high school under context of understanding by students their lecturers (experience in sociological research). Higher education in Russia, 2012, no. 11, pp. 99–105.
  17. Kamalova, N.S., Evsikova, N.Yu., Lisitsin, V.I., Matveev, N.N. Possibility of using of results of module rating system of monitoring of progress of students in evaluation of quality of lecturing of disciplines at high school. Actual directions of scientific research in the 21st century: theory and practice, 2013, no. 5, pp. 433–436.
  18. Korablin, Yu.A. Social security of personality in transformed Russia Moscow, 2004.
  19. Kryukov, V.V., Shakhgeldyan, K.I. Information system for rating evaluation of activity of lecturer at high school. Informatization of education & science, 2009, no. 4, pp. 54–65.
  20. Kryukov, V.V., Shakhgeldyan, K.I. Methodic for evaluation of corporate information environment at high school. Vedomosti of SPbGPU, 2009, no. 2, pp. 212–221.
  21. Kuznetsova, L.G., Khudzhina, M.V. Problems of elaboration of the system for evaluation of activity of lecturer of high school under conditions of realization of educational standards. Science conduction, 2013, no. 1, pp. 14.
  22. Kulikov, G.G., Konev, K.A., Suvorova, V.A., Startsev, G.V. Formation of indicators of criteria for automazed reckoning and monitoring of rating of lecturer in single information space of sub-faculty. Vestnik of Ufa state aviation technical university, 2010, no. 4 (39), pp. 175–184.
  23. Lashkina, O.N., Skuratov, A.K. Informational support for export of Russian education and international partnership of Russia. In: Internet & modern society. Moscow, 2014, pp. 63–65.
  24. Lipatov, V.A. Innovations in medical science and higher education. Moscow, 2010.
  25. Marukhina, O.V., Berestneva, O.G., Bobrova, M.V. Evaluation of quality of activity of lecturer at high school on the basis of methods multi-measured data. International journal of experimental education, 2015, no. 2, pp. 180–185.
  26. Scientific project 3.2.3/4389 Elaboration of informational system for planning and accounting on activity of lecturers on the basis of ratinf system. Vladivostok state university of economics & service.
  27. Nikulina, I.E., Rimskaya, O.N. Student, lecturer and employer in the system of management of quality of educational services. University management, 2006, no. 6 (46), pp. 46–52.
  28. [URL]:
  29. Rabinovich, M.I., Stepanov, Yu.S. On problems of gaining rating evaluations of activity of lecturers, sub-faculties and faculties as to internal high school system of management of quality of education. University management, 2006, no. 6 (46), pp. 53–57.
  30. Elaboration of the system for securing quality of education at economical faculty of AmGU. Vestnik of Amursk state university, 2008, Iss. 43, pp. 141–145.
  31. Rybkin, S.A. Management of styles of lecturing, methodology of evaluation and ways of using results. Economy of education, 2015, no. 1 (86), pp. 31–41.
  32. Timoshevsky, A.A., Kushnir, L.A., Putilo, V.M., Gerasimov, D.V. Evaluation of quality of lecturing in toxicology at training military center by 1st Moscow state medical university n.a. I.M. Sechenov. Moscow, 2013, pp. 466–467.
  33. Trapitsin, S.Yu. Raiting of lecturers as instrument for working and correction of programs of improvement qualification. Modernization of training of pedagogical cadres under conditions of transition onto leveled education. Moscow, 2008, pp. 93–97.
  34. Shakhgeldyan, K.I., Sadon, E.V. Problems of development and introduction of testing system in higher educational institution. Open education, 2006, no. 2, pp. 28–40.
  35. Shestak, V.P., Shestak, N.V. Ethos, rating of high school and publication activity of lecturer of high school. Higher education in Russia, 2012, no. 3, pp. 29–40.
  36. Klein, J.T. Research integration: A comparative knowledge base. In Case Studies in Interdisciplinary Research; SGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2012; pp. 283–298.
  37. Schoolman, E.D., Guest, J.S., Bush, K.F., Bell, A.R. How interdisciplinary is sustainability research? Analyzing the structure of an emerging scientific field. Sustain. Sci. 2012, 7, pp. 67–80.
  38. Winberg, C. Teaching engineering / engineering teaching: Interdisciplinary collaboration and the construction of academic identities. Teach. High. Educ. 2008, 13, pp. 353–367.
  39. Yarime, M., Trencher, G., Mino, T., Sholz, R., Olsson, L., Ness, B., Frantzeskaki, N., Rotmans, J. Establishing sustainability science in higher educational institutions: Towards an integration of academic development, institutionalization, and stakeholder collaborations. Sustain. Sci. 2012, 7, pp. 101–113.