The article, using the example of a seminar lesson in philosophy (section “Epistemology”), demonstrates the use of a methodology for teaching humanities in a modern technical university, tested at the Ural State University of Transport — a methodology that corresponds to the sociocultural realities of the information society, organically integrating key (onto)psychological features “digital generation”. The reasons for the limitations of the use of traditional methods in teaching humanities in technical universities to representatives of generation Z are outlined, as well as ways to solve this issue, reflecting, among other things, the problem of the “generation gap” fixed in the educational space, the socialization of which is divided into “before” and “after” the emergence of the realities of the information society.
Keywords: philosophy, methodology, teaching, university, generation Z, digital generation, critical thinking, information society, teaching
References
1. Order of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation from February 27, 2023 No. 481 “On approval of the federal educational standard of higher education — Bachelor’s degree in the direction of training 08.03.01 Construction” [Electronic resource]. URL: https://base.garant.ru/71705256/53f89421bbdaf741eb2d1ecc4ddb4c33/#block_... (accessed on: 07.06.2024).
2. Pyatiletova, L.V. Methods of teaching philosophy in a modern technical university: ‘challenges’ and ‘answers’ in the paradigm of competence approach. Alma Mater (Vestnik vysshey shkoly). 2021. No. 6. P. 26–29. DOI: 10.20339/AM.06-21.026
3. Tolstikova, T.I., Ignatyeva, O.A., Kondratenko, K.S., Pletnev, A.V. Digital behavior and personality characteristics of generation Z in the conditions of global digitalization. Information society: education, science, culture and technology of the future. 2020. Iss. 4. P. 103–114.
4. Glazkov, A.A., Ermolaev, V.V., Puchkova, E.B., Sukhovershina, Yu.V. Involvement in the virtual environment of generation Z. International Journal of Applied and Fundamental Research. 2015. No. 10. P. 361–368.
5. Balmaeva, S.D., Shlegel, E.V. Cultural skills of the Russian ‘generation Z’. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Vestnik. 2019. No. 4 (109). P. 219–224.
6. Ortega y Gasset, H. The Revolt of the Masses. In: Aesthetics. Philosophy of Culture. Мoscow, 1991. P. 309–350. (In Rus.)
7. Pyatiletova, L.V., Timofeev, O.I. Man of mass society in his relation to art and ‘aristocracy’: ‘zeroing’ and ‘the end of culture’. Scientific and methodological electronic journal “Concept”. 2015. No. 10 (October). P. 31–35. URL: http://e-koncept.ru/2015/15341.htm
8. Lovink, G. Captive to the platform. How we can reclaim the internet. Мoscow, 2024. 232 p. (In Rus.)
9. Cohen, D.K. The traps of teaching. Moscow, 2017. 288 p. (In Rus.)
10. Grinder, J., Bandler, R. Frogs into Princes. Neuro linguistic Programming. Voronezh, 1994. 240 p. (in Rus.)
11. Illouz, E. Cold Intimacies. The Making of Emotional Capitalism. London, 2007. 134 p. (In Eng.)
12. Fortunatov, A.N. Cyberhumanism. How communicative technologies transform our society: a monograph. Мoscow, 2023. P. 8–9.
13. Meira, I. Putting likes means existence. Social Networks, Journalism and the Virus called “Fake News”. Мoscow, 2024. 160 p. (In Rus.)
.png)
