UDC 304:316.4:378
https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.02-20.028
A.A. Oschepkov is Cand.Sci. (Psychology), doc. e-mail: sladkod@yandex.ru ; and A.O. Repin is PhD student e-mail: ep.analytics@bk.ru at Dimitrovgrad Engineering Technological Institute — branch of NIYaU MIFI
Researched is the need of contemporary dramatically-changing society in specialists with high level of originality in problem solving, standing before them, that determines relevance of the problem of personality’s creativity of modern personality. As approach to the pointed problem, in the article the conception of interrelation of such personal characteristics, as values orientations structure and hardiness structure with creativity, interrelated hierarchically-organized dispositional formations, is considered. With the aim of conceptual positions verification, empirical study of values orientations and hardiness of youth with high and low level of hardiness was conducted. The study lets reveal, that values and hardiness personality’s structure of youth with high level of creativity is characterized by orientation on social self-exaltation through active influence onto social environment with manifestation of original thinking ways. The structure of personality values and hardiness of youth with low level of creativity is characterized by great aspiration to harmonic relations with surrounding environment on account of moderation and reciprocity in relations, appearing in ambivalence of thinking.
Key words: creativity, values orientations, hardiness of life, youth.
References
1. Vasilieva, T.V. Problem of formation of value orientations of students. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2014. No. 2 (58). P. 87–91.
2. Karandashev, V.N. Methodic of Shvarts for studying of values of personality: concept and methodical guide. St.-Petersburg, 2004.
3. Ledovskih, I.A., Ruchkova, N.A. Definition of the notion “creative thinking” in scientific literature on psychology. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. N.A. Nekrasova. 2010. No. 3. P. 310–316.
4. Leontiev, D.A., Rasskazova, E.I. Test on life stability. Moscow, 2006.
5. Musina, V.P. Values and life meaning orientations of modern students. Alma mater (Vestnik vysshei shkoly). 2019. No. 7. P. 49–53.
6. Pechenkova, E.A. Psychic processes in their interconnection with creative thinking in personnel of OVD in various situations of professional activity. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2010. No. 10. P. 25–28.
7. Razumnikova, O.M. Connection of intellect of personal features with creativity in students mathematic and humanitarian. Psihologicheskiy zhurnal. 2016. No. 1. P. 69–78.
8. Tomilova, I.I. Theoretical approaches to the notion “creativity”. Almanakh sovremennoj nauki i obrazovaniya. 2014. No. 7 (85). P. 131–133.
9. Tunik, E.E. Psycho-diagnostic of creative thinking. Creative tests. St.-Petersburg, 2002.
10. Hiell, L.A., Zigler, D.D. Theory of personality. Principal components, researches and applying. St.-Petersburg, 2019.
11. Cherneckaya, N.I. Creative thinking in the system of notions of modern psychology. Vestnik Adygejskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2009. No. 2. P. 225–230.
12. Yadov, V.A. Self-regulation and prognosis of social behavior of personality: Dispositional conception. Moscow, 2013.
13. Delahaij, R., Gaillard, A.W., Dam, K. Hardiness and the response to stressful situations: Investigating mediating processes. Personality and Individual Differences. 2010. Vol. 49. Iss. 5. P. 386–390.
14. Kudinov, S.I., Kudinov, S.S., Kudinova, I.B., Belousova, S.S. The axiological orientation of students’ personalities. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art. 2018. Vol. 11. Iss. 1. P. 95–105.
15. Maddi, S., Khoshaba, D., Persico, M., Lu, J., Harvey, R., Bleecker, F. The Personality Construct of Hardiness: Relationships With Comprehensive Tests of Personality and Psychopathology. Journal of Research in Personality. 2002. Vol. 36. P. 72–85.
.png)
