Alma Mater
ISSN 1026-955X
Vestnik Vysshey Shkoly (Higher School Herald)
The best way to learn all about Higher Education

=

The quality assurance system of higher education institutions: use of tests in special disciplines

Veronika P. Monakhova, Anastasia M. Erikova, M.O. Ermakova
$2.50
UDC 378:005.6
DOI 10.20339/AM.07-24.023
 

Veronika P. Monakhova[1], PhD in Engineering, Docent, Moscow Aviation Institute (National Research University), e-mail: monakhovavp@mai.ru

Anastasia M. Erikova, Senior lecturer, Moscow Aviation Institute (National Research University)

Maria O. Ermakova, Senior lecturer, Moscow Aviation Institute (National Research University)

 

[1] Hereinafter Corresponding author

 

This article is devoted to the analysis of the use of tests in special disciplines as a tool for assessing the quality of training of students in higher education institutions. The authors present the results of a study of teachers’ expert opinions on the advantages and disadvantages of using tests in comparison with traditional forms and methods of monitoring the achievement of a given level of competence development by students.

Keywords: the system of assurance of the quality of education at a higher educational institution, the quality of training of students, test, reliability, special disciplines

 

References

  1. Federal Law “On Education in the Russian Federation” dated December 29, 2012 No. 273-ФЗ (as amended). Adopted by the State Duma on December 21, 2012, approved by the Federation Council on December 26, 2012.
  2. Avanesov, V.S. Composition of test tasks: Textbook for teachers of universities, technical schools and colleges, teachers of schools, gymnasiums and lyceums, for students and postgraduates of pedagogical universities. 3rd ed., add. Moscow: Testing Center, 2002. 238 p.
  3. Avanesov, V.S. The form of test tasks. Moscow: Testing Center, 2005. 156 p.
  4. Efremova, N.F. Test control in education. Moscow: University book, Logos, 2007. 263 p.
  5. Zvonnikov, V.I. Measurements and scaling in education. Moscow: Logos, 2006. 136 p.
  6. Zvonnikov, V.I. Chelyshkova, M.B. Modern means of evaluating learning outcomes: a textbook for students of higher educational institutions studying in pedagogical specialties. Moscow: Akademiia, 2007. 222 p.
  7. Mayorov, A.N. Theory and practice of creating tests for the education system. Moscow: Nar. Obrazovanie, 2000. 351 p.
  8. Neiman Yu.M., Khlebnikov, V.A. Introduction to the theory of modeling and parameterization of pedagogical tests. Moscow: Prometheus, 2000. 168 p.
  9. Chelyshkova, M.B. Theory and practice of designing pedagogical tests: a textbook. Moscow: Logos, 2002. 431 p.