UDC 008
https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.09-21.082
S.B. Bondarenko is Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Prof. at Kursk State University e-mail: bondsb@rambler.ru
Presented is the analysis of the problem of methodology of describing of the global technological revolution (GTR). The differences between the industrial revolutions and the GTR are explained. The concepts of attributes, directions, stages and trends of GTR are analyzed and defined. The heuristic usefulness of the concept of tendency for describing the GTR mechanism is substantiated. The practical significance of the basic technical means of cognition, which is used in conducting accurate measurements, is explained. The periodization of GTR is given with the help of the proposed conceptual apparatus. The practical significance of new trends is shown. The basics of the theory of lightning war and the reasons for its creation in the era of GTR are analyzed. The reasons for the popularity of the idea of blitzkrieg in developed countries are explained. The conclusion is substantiated that the most important features of the confrontation of militarism and antimilitarism in the 20th–21st centuries are generated by new trends in the GTR.
Key words: science, technic, globalization, technological revolution, direction, trend, measurement, militarization.
References
1. Touraine, A. The idea of revolution. Sociological Review. 2014. Vol. 13. No. 1. С. 98–116.
2. Touraine, A. La societe post-industrielle. Paris: Denoel, 1969. 319 p.
3. Kudryavtsev, P.S., Konfederatov, I.Ya. History of Physics and Technic. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1965. 571 p.
4. Shukhardin, S.V. Successful Development of Scientific and Technical Revolution in USSR. Priroda. 1976. No. 1. P. 2–7.
5. Bondarenko, S.B. Origins of Global Scientific and Technical Revolution. Alma mater (Vestnik vysshei shkoly). 2021. No. 5. P. 117–122. DOI: 10.20339/AM.05-21.117
6. Ladnaya, N.N., Pokrovsky, V.V., Dementeva, L.A., Sokolova, E.V. The epidemic situation of HIV infection in the Russian Federation in 2019. Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases. 2020. No. 3. P. 17–26.
7. Tsiolkovsky, K.E. Research of world spaces by rockets. Kaluga: GSNH, 1926.128 p.
8. Courtland, R. The microscope revolution that`s sweeping through materials science. Nature. 2018. No. 563. P. 462–464.
9. Schwab, K. The fourth industrial revolution. Moscow: Eksmo, 2016. 138 p.
10. Walker, М. Science in Weimar Germany. Naukovedenie. 2000. No. 2. P. 143–157.
11. Kolenkovsky, A.K. The agile period of the First world imperialist war in 1914. Moscow: Military publishing of the USSR, 1940. 368 p.
12. Ortega-y-Gasset, H. The Revolt of the Masses. Moscow: AST, 2002. 510 p.
13. Wilson, M. American science and invention. Moscow: Znanie, 1975. 133 p.
14. The Russel-Einstein Manifesto. Ecology and Life. 2005. No. 7. P. 8–9.
15. Groves, L.R. Now It Can Be Told. The story of Manhattan project. Moscow: Atomizdat, 1964. 301p.
16. Vozzhenikov, A.V., Cybakov, D.L., Filonov, V.I. Remilitarization world politics in the context of the national security of modern Russia. Management consulting. 2018. No. 1. P. 16–22.
17. Cheng, Y., Ma, N., Witt, Ch., Rapp, St., Wild, Ph., Andreae, M. Face masks effectively limit the probability of SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Science. 2021. Vol. 372. Iss. 6549. P. 1439–1443. DOI: 10.1126/science.abg6296
.png)
