https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.10-18.072
G.F. Shafranov-Kutsev is Dr.Sci. (Philosophy), prof., university scientific head e-mail: Shafranov-Kutsev@utmn.ru; G.Z. Efimova is Cand.Sci. (Sociology), doc. e-mail: G.Z.Efimova@utmn.ru; and A.A. Bulasheva is postgraduate student e-mail: Bulasheva.91@mail.ru at Tyumen State University
Researched is practice of scientific management of postgraduate students, considered is features of practical realization of educational process in postgraduate study as the third level of higher education. Carried out is secondary analysis of researches of researches of national authors, and presented are results of questionnaire of postgraduate students and expert poll of research supervisors. Studied are priority areas of work of beginning research supervisor with postgraduate students, and also analyzed are attitudes of beginner researchers to preparing their dissertation researches. Shown are complications, arising in postgraduate students in the process of education, as well as difficulties, feeling by scientific supervisors during work with beginner researchers. Special attention is paid to influence of personality of research supervisor on the process of preparation by postgraduate student of scientific final qualification work (and then candidate dissertation) in time.
Key words: postgraduate studies, postgraduate student, scientific supervisor, researcher, scientist, questionnaire, postgraduate motivation, dissertation, scientific work, scientific research.
References
1. Anikin, V.M., Poizner, B.N. Scientific supervision over postgraduate students: “internal” and “external” regulators. Izvestia of Saratov university. Physics. 2015. Vol. 15.
2. In Minobrnauka they told about plans reformation of postgraduate study. URL: https://vz.ru/news/2017/12/7/898570.html
3. Vinogradova, E.B., Mudrova, E.B. Evaluation of factors of training of postgraduate students at high school (results of sociological questionnaire). University administration. 2011. No. 5. Pp. 74–83.
4. Gribankova, A.A. Scientific supervision over postgraduate students: social psychological aspects. Higher education in Russia. 2011. No. 7. Pp. 70–74.
5. Gruzdev, I.A., Terentiev, E.A. Facts contra myths: results of sociological questionnaire of postgraduate students of leading high schools. Higher education in Russia. 2017. No. 7. Pp. 89–97.
6. Gusev, A.B. The role of postgraduate study in reproduction of scientific cadres. In: Problem of higher school and reproduction of scientific cadres. Moscow, 2015.
7. Dolmatov, A.V., Erstayn, L.B. Responsibility of scientific supervisor as factor of effectiveness of preparing of scientific research. Alma mater (Vestnik vysshei shkoly). 2017. No. 4. Pp. 91–95. DOI 10.20339/AM.04-17.091.
8. Kotlyarov, I.D. Problems of qualifications of scientific supervisors. Scientific theoretical journal “Scientific notes”. 2010. No. 8. Pp. 46–48.
9. Mills, Ch.R. Sociological imagination. Moscow, 2001.
10. Principal indicators of activity of postgraduate study. URL: http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/population/obraz/asp-1xls
11. Plenary session of the congress of Russian union of rectors. URL: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/57367
12. Training of scientific cadres of higher qualification in Russia. Moscow, 2017.
13. Putin criticized activity of postgraduate study in Russia. URL: https://gazeta.ru/science/news/2018/04/26/n_11462845.shtml
14. Reznik, S.D., Makarova, S.N. Raising of the role of scientific supervision over postgraduate students in guaranteeing quality of training young specialists in Russia. Penza, 2016.
15. Resolution of the first professors’ forum. URL: http://ппф2018.рф/o-forum/
16. Robotova, A.S. Activity of scientific supervisor: reflective notes. Higher education in Russia. 2009. No. 7. Pp. 34–41.
17. Fatykhova, R.M. Culture of contacts between supervisor and postgraduate student as condition of effectiveness of scientific activity. Pedagogical journal of Bashkortostan. 2012. No. 1. Pp. 34–40.
18. Quality of dissertations is going down despite of strengthening requests. URL: https://ria.ru/society/20180426/1519492872.html
19. Ersteyn, L.B. Specific of scientific supervision over jurisprudence postgraduate students under contemporary conditions. Vestnik of St. Petersburg jurisprudence academy. 2012. No. 1. Pp. 34–40.
20. Gatfield, T. An investigation into PhD supervisory management styles: Development of a dynamic conceptual model and it’s managerial implications. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 2005. No. 27 (3). Pp. 311–325.
21. Li, S., Seale, C. Managing criticism in PhD supervision: qualitative case study. Studies in Higher Education. 2007. No. 32 (4). Pp. 511–526.
22. Exstam, M. Helping postgraduate students to learn “the rules of the game” in and through the thesis writing process in English. Vestnik BDU. 2014. No. 1. Pp. 98–101.
23. Paglis, L.L., Green, S.G., Bauer, T.N. Does advisor mentoring add value? Longitudinal study of mentoring in doctoral student outcomes. Research in Higher Education. 2006. No. 47 (4). Pp. 451–476.
.png)
