Alma Mater
ISSN 1026-955X
Vestnik Vysshey Shkoly (Higher School Herald)
The best way to learn all about Higher Education

=

Means of mobile communication in pedagogical interaction process

O.V. Ershova
$2.50

 

 

https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.04-18.009

O.V. Ershova is Cand.Sci. (Pedagogy), doc. at Russian University of Economics n.a. G.V. Plekhanov e-mail: ershova.ov@rea.ru

 

Analyzed is the theme of means оf mobile communication as essential part of modern learners’ lives. Characterized are the role in educational process of means оf mobile communication (e-books, laptops, tablets, cell phones, smart watch with widening functioning) and other technologies, enabling autonomous self-functioning. As basic object of research mobile cell phone was chosen on the basis of the fact, that precisely it’s use by learners on lessons causes a large number of worries of practice educators and makes the problem for them, that influence on pedagogical interaction process. The article is aimed at analyzing the problem in pedagogical interaction process, when students use cell phone in class. Three possible resources are offered by the author for solution of this problem. Also the author’s algorithm of work is presented, illustrating productive way to build effective interaction pedagogical process.

Key words: pedagogue, student, means of mobile communication, cell phone, pedagogical interaction process.

References

  1. Baydullaeva, G.Е., Мurathan, I.G., Мyrzahanov, D.F. The influence of mobile phone on the human body. Almanac of world science. 2016, no. 3-1 (6), pp. 20–21.
  2. Belugin, S.А. Awareness of 1st year students on the impact of mobile phones on the body. Newsletter of the Northern state medical university. 2012, no. 1 (28), pp. 164–165.
  3. Borisova, U.S. To the problem of involving of modern educational technologies into educational process. Professional standard. The formation of labor resources of high qualification. Yakutsk, 2013, pp. 52–57.
  4. Broydo, V.L., Ilyina, O.P. M-learning in higher education landscape. Information technology in business. Moscow, 2013, pp. 150–158.
  5. Vasil’eva, Т.I., Sarokvasha, O.Yu. The influence of electromagnetic fields of a mobile phone on the human body depending on age. Bulletin of Samara State Medical University. 2012, no. 3/2 (94), pp. 29–36.
  6. Vas’bieva, D.G. The possibilities to integrate mobile technologies in the process of foreign language teaching in non-linguistic higher education establishment. Philological Sciences. The theory and practice. 2016, no. 5–3 (59), pp. 193–195.
  7. Golitsina, I.N., Polovnokova, N.L. Mobile learning as new technology in education. Educational technology and society. 2011, no. 1, pp. 241–252.
  8. Ershova, O.V. The concepts “motivation” and “interest” as means of increasing efficiency assessment of educational activity of high school students. Higher education today. 2013, no. 8, pp. 79–81.
  9. Zablotsky, V.R. The using of mobile phones in education. Slavic forum. 2015, no. 1 (7), pp. 52–63.
  10. Zul’fikarova, Z.А. The advantages and disadvantages of mobile phones for students. Recent scientific studies in the modern world. 2016, no. 5–3 (13), pp. 126–129.
  11. Каbesheva, А.А. The study of emotional states students depending on conditions of mobile phone use. In: Paradigm. Kiev, 2015, pp. 137–151.
  12. Каrelin, A.О., Babal’yan, А.V. Sanitary value of mobile phone usage by students of Pavlov 1st St.-Petersburg State Medical University. Scientific notes of the 1st State Medical University of St.-Petersburg. 2016, no. 1, pp. 62–66.
  13. Коvalev, S. Smartphones with a stylus: “Hello” from the past, or a new trend? URL: http://setphone.ru/stati/smartfony-so-stilusom-privet-iz-proshlogo-ili-novyj-trend/
  14. Коroleva, D.О. Always online: the use of mobile technology and social networking with modern teenagers at home and school. Educational Studies. 2016, no. 1, pp. 205–224.
  15. Коtova, S.А., Моshkova, N.P. Junior schoolchild and mobile phone: risks of developing gadget-addiction. In: Global dynamics of social processes of modernity. Moscow, 2009, pp. 436–441.
  16. Кulapin, V.I., Кnyaz’kov, A.V., Коzhichkin, E.Yu., Shpengler, N.V. Control system use of mobile phones. Reliability & quality. 2014, vol. 2, pp. 95–96.
  17. Маyorova, E.S., Оshurkov, V.А., Tsuprik, L.S. Actual status of iOS, Android and Windows Phone mobile applications development tools. Perspectives of science and education. 2015, no. 4 (16), pp. 83–87.
  18. Маrakhova, V.А., Khorseva, N.I. Parental competence in the field of mobile culture of children as one of the key problems of psychological and pedagogical prevention. Problems of modern pedagogical education. 2016, no. 52-6, pp. 377–384.
  19. How does the monitor screen of the smartphone and tablet influence on vision children? URL: http://meduniver.com/Medical/profilaktika/kak_vliaet_monitor_na_zrenie_detei.html
  20. Меrkulov, A.M. Learning with mobile devices – a new paradigm of e-learning. Young scientist. 2012, no. 3, pp. 70–75.
  21. Мishina, A.V. The analysis of advantage of using mobile phones by students at class lessons. In: The role of innovation in quality assurance. Moscow, 2015, pp. 73–75.
  22. Моgilev, A.V. Mobile phone in the classroom: good or evil? National education. 2014, no. 7, pp. 186–190.
  23. Моrozov, М.А. The effect of mobile phone on the body. In: Safety: psycho-pedagogical and medico-biological aspects. Moscow, 2013, pp. 278–279.
  24. Nefedov, I.V., Popova, K.A. M-learning as innovation means in RFL teaching. News of Southern Federal University. 2016, no. 3, pp. 170–178.
  25. Оbukhova, Yu.О. Youth and mobile phone: roles acting out in self-presentation. Discussions. 2011, no. 7, pp. 120–124.
  26. Pakhomova, Т.E. Mobile Technologies as a Means of Preparing of Pedagogical College Students for Professional Problems Solving. Professional education, theory and methodology of training. 2014, no. 6, pp. 112–117.
  27. Polyakova, А. Mobile phone as a means of individualization of education. National education. 2007, no. 7, pp. 245–248.
  28. Sanatina, Yu. The glasses to the tablet. URL: https://rg.ru/2015/03/18/reg-urfo/zrenie.html
  29. Sautina, A.G., Tsvelyukh, I.P. Pedagogical prevention addiction to mobile phones at younger teenagers. NovaInfo.Ru. 2015, no. 39, pp. 260–264.
  30. Serguchev, P.А. Negative influence of mobile phones. Culture. Spirituality. Society. 2014, no. 15, pp. 87–92.
  31. Sokol’nikov, А.М. M-learning: problems and prospects of development. Cybernetics and programming. 2013, no. 6, pp. 28–34.
  32. Abutalipova, R.A. The cell phone as a means of cultural communication. Teacher of Bashkortostan. 2016, no. 6, pp. 117–119.
  33. Mobile Technology Goes to School. URL: http://www.educationworld.com/a_tech/tech/tech248.shtml
  34. Pulatova, Z.A., Rakhimova, Sh.A. Pedagogical theories supporting the using of mobile phone in EFL classes. Science and World. 2016, no. 4 (32), pp. 76–78.
  35. Traxler, J. Current State of Mobile Learning. International Review on Research in Open and Distance Learning. URL: www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/346/875
  36. Teodora, D. M-learning – a viable way of learning 2009. URL: http://www.ris.uvt.ro/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/tchicioreanu.pdf