Non-parametric sociometry in analysis of connection between formal and in-formal sub-structure of communication of senior school persons

https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.04-17.037  

G.F. Golubeva is Cand.Sci. (Psychology), doc. at Bryansk State University n.a. academician I.G. Petrovsky e-mail: golubeva.galia2012@yandex.ru

Discussed is actual theme of non-parametric sociometry in analysis of connection between formal and informal sub-structure of communication of senior school persons. Characterized is the process of training in senior classes of schools and higher educational institutions from positions of social and pedagogical psychology. Presented are empirical data as to the named process, obtained with using the questionnaire by Kettel and method of non-parametric sociometry in analysis of connection between success of training and group sociometric indexes. The author’s conclusion is made, that the higher cohesion in collective of senior school persons and students is, the higher is indicator of success in class. Also presented are practical recommendations for successful realization of method of non-parametric sociometry in educational process.

Key words: non-parametric sociometry, status of students, personal traits, sociometric coherence, success of training.

References

1. Bodrov, V.A. Psychological features of professional group. In: Practicum on differential psycho-diagnostics of professional suitability. Moscow, 2003, pp. 199-210.
2. Golubeva, G.F. Formation of professional identity of  future professionals. Alma mater (Vestnik vysshei shkoly), 2014, no. 9, pp. 47–49.
3. Golubeva, G.F., Spasennikov, V.V. Economic psychology of business communications. Bryansk, 2013.
4. Glotochkin, A.D. Methodic of formation of small groups taking into account interpersonal and operational aspects of interaction of operators. Psychological magazine, 1986, no. 1, pp. 22–27.
5. Deev, A.A. Automation of procedure of inspection when using a 16 factorial personal questionnaire. Psychological magazine, 1984, no. 6, pp. 106–110.
6. Moreno, Ya.L. Sociometrics. Experimental method and science about society. Moscow, 2001.
7. Samoylenko, E.S. Features of subject focused comparison in relation to school students with various sociometric status. Experimental psychology, 2011, no. 1, pp. 65–84.
8. Spasennikov, V.V. The analysis and design of group activities in applied psychological researches. Moscow, 1992.
9. Spasennikov, V.V. Device for assessment of psychological compatibility of examinees. Moscow, 1990.
10. Spasennikov, V.V. Economic Psychology. Moscow, 2003.
11. Tajfel, H. Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge, 1981.
12. Turner, J. Social Categorization and the Self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In: Advances in group processes. London, 1985, pp. 77–121.