Conclusion of dissertation board on defended dissertation work: why it’s quite often returned is in boards with serious remarks

Reznik S.D.

Doctor of economic Sciences, Professor, Director of Institute of economy and

management of the Penza state University of architecture and construction

Sazikina O.A.

candidate of economic Sciences, associate Professor of the Department «Management»

of the Penza state University of architecture and construction

E-mail: disser@bk.ru

Examined are some shortcomings in dissertation works, accepted by dissertation boards on defended dissertations. Special attention is paid to formulation of scientific results and their scientific novelty, and also to personal contribution of competitor for dissertation, reliability of put-forward provisions by him, their value for theory and practice, recommendations about practical use of research results, as well as of general conclusions.

Key words: dissertation board, conclusion, dissertation work.

References

1. Kazakov, Yu. Formulations of scientific novelty and conclusions in dissertation works // Alma mater (Vestnik vysshei shkoly). — 2003. — No. 2. — P. 32—36.

2. Klimov, E.A. About some undesirable traditions in work of dissertation councils on pedagogical and psychological sciences // Bulletin VAK. — 2002. — No. 1. — P. 22—28.

3. Komarov, S.A., Yakushev, A.N. Criteria to which theses have to answer: scientific incompetence or deliberate deception? // Juridical thought. — 2013. — No. 1. — P. 130—134.

4. Provision on council for protection of theses on competition of scientific degree of candidate of science, on competition of scientific degree of doctor of science. Approved by the order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation of January 13, 2014, No. 7 // Rossiyskaya gazetta. — March 5, 2014.

5. Provision on order of award of scientific degrees. Approved as resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation, September 24, 2013, No. 842.

6. Reznik, S.D. How to defend your dissertation thesis. — M.: INFRA-M, 2013.

7. Management of the dissertation Council. — M.: INFRA-M, 2011.

8. Feldstein, D.I. Dissertation research in the field of pedagogics and psychology: current state and ways of improvement of quality // Higher education today. — 2008. — No. 2. — P. 59—66.

9. Feldstein, D.I. Perspectives of psychology and pedagogical science and the problem of certification of scientists // Pedagogics. — 2013. — No. 2. — P. 3—16. 

10. Filippov, V.M. Tasks for raising of scientific level and responsibility of dissertation councils // Sociology of education. — 2013. — No. 5. — P. 4—10.