DOI 10.20339/AM.02-26.037
Lyudmila G. Turgunova, MD, Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Karaganda Medical University, Karaganda, Kazakhstan; ScopusID: 15137643000, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6962-4247
Irina V. Mekhantseva, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Karaganda Medical University, Karaganda, Kazakhstan; ScopusID: 58735354500, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6601-8172, e-mail: mehanceva@qmu.kz
Yelena M. Laryushina, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Head of the Department of Internal Medicine, Karaganda Medical University, Karaganda, Kazakhstan; ScopusID: 57196123971, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9590-690X
Dinara N. Sheryazdanova, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Karaganda Medical University, Karaganda, Kazakhstan; ScopusID: 57220897266, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9029-4326
Marina R. Izmailovich, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Karaganda Medical University, Karaganda, Kazakhstan; ScopusID: 57215308441, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8128-4356
Farida U. Nildibaeva, Assistant Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Karaganda Medical University, Karaganda, Kazakhstan; ScopusID: 57193765164, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3900-7499
The aim of this study was to evaluate the perceived effectiveness of clinical teaching among undergraduate medical students and medical interns using The Cleveland Clinical Teaching Effectiveness Instrument (CCTEI). The relevance of this work is determined by the key role of the clinical learning environment in developing essential professional competencies, including motivation, autonomy, clinical reasoning, and the ability to apply evidence-based medicine. Despite the importance of early clinical exposure, the organization of clinical training remains challenging and requires regular assessment and feedback to ensure high-quality instruction. A total of 729 respondents were included: 588 undergraduate students and 141 medical interns. The CCTEI questionnaire, consisting of 15 items rated on a five-point scale, was used for evaluation. Statistical analysis was performed using nonparametric methods. The results demonstrated that interns consistently rated most aspects of clinical teaching significantly higher than undergraduate students, particularly in motivation, autonomy, quality of feedback, development of practical and diagnostic skills, clinical relevance of training, and adaptation to real clinical settings. Overall satisfaction with the educational process was also higher among interns. This study highlights the need to strengthen practice-oriented components at the undergraduate level, expand simulation-based training, and develop formalized mentorship systems to enhance the quality of clinical education.
Keywords: clinical teaching, learning environment, learning satisfaction, clinical competencies, CCTEI, teaching effectiveness assessment, motivation, feedback, practical skills
The study did not receive external funding
Литература/References
1. Irby, D.M., O’Brien, B.C., Stenfors, T., Palmgren, P.J. Selecting instruments for measuring the clinical learning environment of medical education: a 4-domain framework. Academic Medicine. 2021. Vol. 96. No. 2. Pp. 218–225.
2. Ostovarfar, J., Soufi, S.K., Moosavi, M. et al. Clinical learning evaluation questionnaire: a reliable and valid tool for the evaluation of clinical education by educators and students. BMC Medical Education. 2023. Vol. 23. Pp. 618. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04601-w
3. Tackett, S., Wright, S., Lubin, R., Li, J., Pan, H. International study of medical school learning environments and their relationship with student well-being and empathy. Medical Education. 2017. Vol. 51. No. 3. Pp. 280–289.
4. Liu, C., Tang, K., Wang, Y. et al. Impacts of early clinical exposure on undergraduate student professionalism — a qualitative study. BMC Medical Education. 2022. Vol. 22. Pp. 435. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03505-5
5. Asadi, M., Noorian, S., Motefakker, S., Heydari, F., Shahsavari, N., Senmar, M. The state of clinical education and factors affecting effective clinical education: the point of view of nursing and midwifery students. BMC Medical Education. 2023. Vol. 23. No. 1. Pp. 967. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04957-z
6. Levy-Feldman, I. The role of assessment in improving education and promoting educational equity. Education Sciences. 2025. Vol. 15. No. 2. Pp. 224. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020224
7. Khoshbakht-Pishkhani, M., Javadi-Pashaki, N., Esfandi, N.A., Koodakani, M.B., Maroufizadeh, S., Madani, A.H. The effect of educational application in nursing internship clinical training on cognitive and functional skills and students’ satisfaction. BMC Nursing. 2024. Vol. 23. No. 1. Pp. 381. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-01954-5
8. Zhu, W., Jiao, T., Chen, G. The impact of clinical learning environment factors on caring behaviors: the mediating role of psychological resilience among nursing intern students. BMC Nursing. 2025. Vol. 24. Pp. 1187. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03840-0
9. Ayatollahi J., Akhondimeybodi Z., Shahcheraghi S., et al. (Название статьи отсутствует) // Journal of Medical Research. 2022. Vol. 8, No. 1. P. 29–32. DOI: 10.31254/jmr.2022.8108
10. Aljohni, K.A., Almarwani, A.M., Tubaishat, A., Awadh, A.A., Aljohani, M.S. Nurse interns’ experiences with the clinical learning environment and supervision. Teaching and Learning in Nursing. 2023. Vol. 18. No. 4. Pp. e123–e128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2023.04.011
11. González Martínez, J.F., Pimienta Prieto, J.H., Rivera Sánchez, J.J., Paredes Palma, J.C. Assessment of satisfaction of undergraduate intern medics according to an educative model in the Hospital General de México. Revista Médica del Hospital General de México. 2015. Vol. 78. No. 2. Pp. 73–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hgmx.2015.06.001
12. Ayenew, T., Tadesse, A.F., Fikru, T. et al. Satisfaction of medical and health science students with their clinical learning environment and its determinant factors at Debre Markos University, northwest Ethiopia. BMC Medical Education. 2024. Vol. 24. No. 1. Pp. 1113. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06114-6
13. Shah, N., Desai, C., Jorwekar, G., Badyal, D., Singh, T. Competency-based medical education: an overview and application in pharmacology. Indian Journal of Pharmacology. 2016. Vol. 48 (Suppl. 1). Pp. S5–S9. https://doi.org/10.4103/0253-7613.193312
14. Goldhamer, M.E.J., Pusic, M.V., Nadel, E.S., Co, J.P.T., Weinstein, D.F. Promotion in place: a model for competency-based, time-variable graduate medical education. Academic Medicine. 2024. Vol. 99, No. 5. Pp. 518–523. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005652











.png)






