UDC 140+314/316
Maxim S. Kozyrev, Cand. Sci. (Philosophy), Docent, Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia; Russian University of Economics named after G.V. Plekhanov, Russia, Moscow; ORCID ID: 0000-0002-1643-3391; Researcher ID: 57188625469, e-mail: max-han@yandex.ru
The purpose of the article is to identify the features of the social opposition between the population and the systemic opposition based on the analysis of the ideology of the latter. The methodological basis of the work is the concept that a certain social position corresponds to certain points of view and a type of thinking (total ideology). As a result of the study, it was concluded that despite the oppositional nature of thinking, the attitude towards the population and the habitus of the counter-elite correspond to high-status positions in the social hierarchy. Apparently, they have occupied the niche of professional opposition politicians, which makes it possible to extract all the benefits they need. The established social and political order suits them and they are not going to change it, and they do not intend to wage a life-and-death struggle for the positions currently occupied by the ruling elite. The circle of social contacts is unlikely to go beyond the elite and near-elite strata. Accordingly, they do not represent or protect the real interests of any other social groups, except for their own. For the parties of the systemic opposition, the population is exclusively an object of influence, it is denied subjectivity. The political struggle for the most part remains out of sight of the masses, which is carried out exclusively for the status positions of the ruling elite. The systemic opposition is deeply conservative despite its “left” or “right” slogans. Their seizure of power, if such a thing is possible at all, will not lead to significant social transformations.
Keywords: ideology, document analysis, social differentiation, systemic opposition, opposition.
References
1. Bourdieu, P. Sociology of Social Space. Moscow: Institute of Experimental Sociology Press; St. Petersburg: Aleteia, 2007. 288 p.
2. Gadamer, G.-G. Actuality of the Beautiful. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1991. 366 p.
3. Hirtz, K. Interpretation of Cultures (transl. from Engl.). Moscow: Russian Political Encyclopedia (ROSSPEN), 2004. 560 p.
4. Derrida, J. On Grammatology. Moscow: Ad Marginem, 2000. 512 p.
5. Zhirinovsky, V.V. Let’s avenge Russia! Moscow: Publication of the Liberal Democratic Party of Russia, 2000. P. 52.
6. Zhirinovsky, V.V., Sidorov, M.N. Politics and Economics for Russia. Moscow: Publishing house of the Liberal Democratic Party of Russia, 2007. 160 .
7. Zyuganov, G.A. Security of the state is under threat! Economic Strategies. 2011. V. 13. No. 3 (89). P. 6–15.
8. Zyuganov, G.A. Ideology of traitors. Bereginya. 777. Sova: Society. Politics. Economy. 2016. No. 2 (29). P. 132–140.
9. Zyuganov, G.A. Communists – 21. Moscow: Algorithm, 2012. 254 p.
10. Zyuganov, G.A. Necessary changes for the sake of saving the country. Pravda. 2012.01.12. URL: https://kprf.ru/party_live/101233.html (accessed on: 05.06.2023).
11. Zyuganov, G.A. Truth and lies in the mirror of the crisis. Pravda. 06.02.2009. URL: https://kprf.ru/rus_soc/63522.html (accessed on: 05.06.2023).
12. Zyuganov, G.A. Development of the country - a way out of the crisis. Bereginya. 777. Sova: Society. Politics. Economy. 2016. No. 1 (28). P. 117–123.
13. Kozyrev, M.S. Dichotomy “elite–masses” in the publications of representatives of the political party “United Russia”. Eurasian Law Journal. 2017. No. 4 (107). P. 407–411.
14. Kozyrev, M.S. The study of the influence of social structure on ideology in the works of Karl Mannheim. Social Policy and Sociology. 2014. No. 4 (105). P. 150–162.
15. Kozyrev, M.S. The study of the influence of social structure on ideology in the works of Pierre Bourdieu. Sociodynamics. 2022. No. 2. P. 44–52.
16. The CPRF will do everything possible to save Russian science and education! (Interview with G.A. Zyuganov). Pravda. 23.03.2012. URL: https://kprf.ru/dep/89361.html (accessed on: 05.06.2023).
17. LDPR. Freaks. Moscow: LDPR Publishing House, 2011. 94 p.
18. Levichev, N.V. Political diary 2015: articles, speeches, comments, interviews Chairman of the Council of the Chamber of Deputies of the A Just Russia Party. Moscow: Klyuch-S, 2016. 254 p.
19. Mannheim, K. Diagnosis of our time. Moscow: Yurist, 1994. 700 p.
20. Mannheim, K. Ideology and Utopia. Moscow: INION, 1992. 245 p.
21. Merton, R.K. Social Theory and Social Structure. Moscow: AST: AST Moscow: Khranitel’, 2006. 873 p.
22. Mironov, S.M. In the interests of the people. Moscow: Klyuch-S, 2011. URL: http://31.44.80.183/files/pf55/048368.pdf ( accessed on: 05.06.2023).
23. Mironov, S.M. In difficult times together with the people: selected articles, speeches, interviews of the chairman of the political party A Just Russia (2015). Moscow: Klyuch-S, 2016. 320 p.
24. Mironov, S.M. From February to October 1917: lessons and conclusions. Moscow: Klyuch-S, 2017. URL: http://31.44.80.183/files/pf60/082022.pdf (accessed on: 05.06.2023)
25. Mironov, S.M. Only Forward: Selected Articles, Speeches, Interviews of the Chairman of the Political Party A Just Russia (2013). Moscow: Klyuch-S, 2014. URL: http://31.44.80.183/files/pf56/059364.pdf (accessed on: 05.06.2023).
26. Mironov, S.M. Social strategy of the party: verified by life: selected articles, speeches, interviews of the Chairman of the Political Party A Just Russia. Moscow: Klyuch-S, 2017. URL: http://31.44.80.183/files/pf60/081717.pdf (accessed on 05.06.2023).
27. Mironov, S.M. The Economics of injustice. Moscow: Klyuch-S, 2015. URL: http://31.44.80.183/files/pf59/072198.pdf (accessed on: 05.06.2023).
28. Eco, U. From the Tree to the Labyrinth: Historical Studies of the Sign and Interpretation. O.A. Popova-Ple (transl.). Moscow: Academic Project, 2016. 559 p.
.png)
