UDC 378:005.94
https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.04-23.066
Aleksandr A. Yurganov, Candidate of Philosophy, Associate Professor of Department of Philosophy, Psychology and Pedagogy; Trainer at the Process Factory training centre, Kuban State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, ORСID 0000-0003-1153-5011, e-mail: ssssss1984@mail.ru
Karine B. Sadym, PhD in History, Associate Professor of the Department of Philosophy, Psychology and Pedagogy at Kuban State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; ORCID 0000-0002-9892-4257, e-mail: karinakor@mail.ru
Arshaluys K. Magakyan, 3rd year dental student at Kuban State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, ORCID 0000-0003-4082-5763, e-mail: annamag200288@gmail.com
The purpose of this paper is to describe conceptually (in the discourse of G.P. Shchedrovitsky, I. Nonaka, H. Takeuchi) the parameters and the type of university capable of being a space of collective thinking intensification, i.e. such innovation platform where it is possible not only to solve the “main question” of modern university: “How to match thinking and activity?”, but also to find the balance between the laws of ‘business’ and ‘science’ functioning. We describe the ‘project part’ — the first stage of organizing such a space, thanks to which it becomes possible to intensify the processes of knowledge creation and exchange in the university, as well as the process of forming a more open innovation corporate culture. The methodological basis here is organized communication, which allows the formation of an open system of horizontal social links within the university for the implementation of its innovative activities.
Keywords. Collective thinking, communication, research activity, knowledge management, Nonaka I., Takeuchi H., system-thinking-activity approach, SMD approach, methodology, G.P. Shchedrovitsky.
References
1. Shrubchenko, A.V. Features of Informal Communications in Higher Education Institutions. Theories and Problems of Political Research. 2016. No. 5. P. 90–99.
2. Shchedrovitsky, G.P. Scheme of Thinking Activity — System-Structural Structure, Meaning and Content. In: System Studies. Methodological Problems. Yearbook 1986. Moscow, 1987. P. 124–146.
3. Granovetter, M. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78 (6): 1360–1380; Burt, Ronald S. (1992) ‘Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition’. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
4. Shchedrovitsky, P.G. A condensed statement of SMD-methodology ontology as a system of principles. Centaur Network Journal. URL: http://v2.circleplus.ru/archive/s1994/tezis/0/sgatoe/text; Piskoppel. A.A., Rozin, V.M., Goldberg, F.N., Bernstein, V.L., Aleksandrov, P.S. Systemo-mindfulness methodology. Humanitarian Portal: Concepts. 2020. URL: https://gtmarket.ru/concepts/7268 (accessed on: 09.03.2022).
5. Shchedrovitsky, P.G. Universities and knowledge circulation systems. URL: http://ftp-www.bsu.edu.ru/Skolkovo/П.Г.%20Щедровицкий%20-%20Университеты%20и%20система%20обращения%20знаний.pdf (accessed on: 09.03.2022).
6. Malinovsky, P.V. Knowledge as a subject of management in terms of methodology: intellectual, institutional and instrumental contexts. URL: https://www.fondgp.ru/old/lib/chteniya/xv/abstracts/10.html (accessed on: 09.03.2022).
7. Asaul, A.N. Creating knowledge and information structure of entrepreneurship subjects. URL: https://lib.usue.ru/resource/free/11/e173.pdf (accessed on: 09.03.2022).
8. Innovative Educational Project “Model of Creating Innovative Corporate Culture of Educational Organizations in the System of Higher Professional Education”. URL: https://www.ksma.ru/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/R-R_R-2020-R-R-RgR-RS-Rjo... (accessed on: 23.11.2022).
9. Gratton, L. Hot spots. How organisations, groups and teams create the energy to drive innovation. St. Petersburg: BestBusinessBooks, 2009. P. 283.
10.Handbook “Boiling Points”. URL: https://boilingpoint.rf2035.net/ (accessed on: 23.11.2022).
11. Fukuyama, F. The end of history and the last man / transl. from Eng. Moscow: AST, 2015. 588 p.
12. Eagleton, T. The slow death of the university. URL: https://scepsis.net/library/id_3672.html (accessed on; 31.08.2022).
13. Ridings, B. University in ruins / transl. from Eng. Moscow: HSE Publishing House, 2010. 304 p.
14. Mironov, V.V. Reflections on Russian Education Reform: Report at the International Research Conference “Philosophy and Education in the Process of Culture Transformation” dedicated to the 70th Anniversary of Philosophy Faculty Reestablishment within Lomonosov MSU. Moscow: A.V. Vorobyov Publishing House, 2011.
15. Model of Strategic Management of Higher Education Institution Based on Balanced Scorecard: Proceedings of VI International Conference of RAIVO. Мoscow, 2015.
16. Wissema, J.G. Towards the Third Generation University: Managing the University in Transition / transl. from Eng. Мoscow: Sberbank, 2016. 422 p.
17. Nonaka, Y., Takeuchi, H. The company is a knowledge creator. The Origin and Development of Innovation in Japanese Firms / transl. from Eng. Moscow, 2003.
18. Bezginova, Yu.A., Garanina, T.A., Kudryavtsev, D.V., Pleshkova, A.Yu. Knowledge management practices in oil companies. Open education. URL: https://doi.org/10.21686/1818-4243-2018-6-27-38 (accessed on: 13.09.2022).
19. Isakov, V.B. Game Practice: Experience of Teaching the Basics of Law at School and University. Moscow: HSE. 2012. 132 p.
20. Shchedrovitsky, P.G. To the Analysis of the Topics of Organizational and Operational Games: Preprint / USSR Academy of Sciences. Pushchino: NCBI, 1987. 42 с.
21. Efimov, V.S. Multisapiense — collectively thinking machines. New University Life. Web site. URL: https://gazeta.sfu-kras.ru/node/5091 (accessed on: 26.11.2022).
22. Efimov, V.S., Lapteva, A.V. Cognitive University: contours of the future. University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2014. No. 6. P. 18–29.
.png)
