UDC 37.09:1
https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.06-21.026
L.V. Pyatiletova is Cand. Sci. (Philosophy), Ass. Prof., Ass. Prof., Department of USES at Ural State University of Railway Transport е-mail: Lyuda.p73@yandex.ru
Analyzed is the problem of teaching philosophy at a modern technical university: the place and significance of philosophy in the university cycle of disciplines, its genetic connection with the mission of the university. The relevance of this problem and the search for answers to the challenges of the time sharply raises the question that is latently present within the competence-based approach implemented in the modern educational space — about effective methods of teaching philosophy as an academic discipline within the framework of a technical university in close connection, taking into account the characteristics of students - course participants, representatives of technical areas of study that have a certain specificity of the perception of social and humanitarian knowledge. The article reveals the potential of such discipline teaching methods as Socratic and Pragmatic, the active use of which opens up prospects for a new ontology of university philosophy: as an anthropological practice of the Other, a practice that organically absorbs the utilitarian expectations from studying the content of the university discipline “Philosophy” by students of technical specialties.
Key words: philosophy, higher education, teaching methods, Socratic method, Pragmatic method, competence-based approach, university, technical university, anthropological practice.
References
1. Troyanskaya, S.L. Fundamentals of the competence-based approach in higher education. Izhevsk, 2016. 176 p.
2. Degtyarev, V.A., Tribunskaya, V.A. Competence-based approach — a new paradigm of education. Bulletin of social and humanitarian education and science, 2014. No. 4. P. 35–47.
3. Pyatiletova, L.V. Specificity of teaching philosophy in a modern technical university: methodological possibilities of pragmatism. istorical, philosophical, political and legal sciences, cultural studies and art history. Questions of theory and practice Tambov: Diploma, 2015. No. 1 (51): in 2 parts. Part 1. P. 160–162.
4. Shchelkunov, M.D. Problems of Russian educational reforms. Problems of Philosophy. 2018. No. 6. P. 19–33.
5. Kirabaev, N.S. Education of a Citizen: On Teaching Philosophy in Higher Educational Institutions of Russia. Problems of Philosophy. 2018. No. 6. P. 19–33.
6. Order on the approval of the Federal State Educational Standard of the highest state educational standard in the direction of training 09.03.02 Information technology systems (bachelor’s level). URL: http://fgosvo.ru/news/5/1081 (accessed on: 16.02.2021).
7. Guseynov, A. Philosophy as a profession. URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMw1PcKCG38 (accessed on: 16.02.2021).
8. Myasnikova, L.A., Nagevichiene, V.Ya. Experience: Finding Openness and Revelation. Yekaterinburg, 1997. 96 p.
9. Gurin S. Practice of oneself and practice of another. URL: https://www.topos.ru/article/ontologicheskie-progulki/praktiki-sebya-i-p... (accessed on: 16.02.21).
10. Skirbekk, G., Guilier, N. History of philosophy. Moscow, 2001. P. 83.
11. Guseynov, G.Ch. Traps on the path of human improvement. Book Review: David K. Cohen. The pitfalls of teaching [Electronic resource]. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/lovushki-na-puti-sovershenstvovaniya-c... (accessed on: 02.03.2021).
12. Shcheglova, I.A., Koreshnikova, Yu.N., Parshina, O.A. The role of student involvement in the development of critical thinking. Education Issues. 2019. No. 1. P. 264–289.
13. Interuniversity scientific and practical student conference “Philosophical and socio-psychological aspects of management”. URL: https://www.usurt.ru/science/konferentsii/03-12-2020 (accessed on: 02.03.2021).
14. Ortega y Gasset, H. Mission of the University. Minsk, 2005. 104 p.
15. Chepurenko, A.Yu. How and why to teach students entrepreneurship: polemical notes. Education Issues. 2017. No. 3. P. 250–276.
.png)
