Alma Mater
ISSN 1026-955X
Vestnik Vysshey Shkoly (Higher School Herald)
The best way to learn all about Higher Education

=

About quality of dissertations, or this strange GOST

Yu.V. Kazakov
80,00 Р

UDC 001.89+378

https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.05-21.065  

 

Yu.V. Kazakov is Dr. Sci. (Engineering), Prof., Prof. of Department of Welding, Pressured Metals Processing and Related Processes, Honored Worker of Higher Education at Togliatti State University e-mail: Kazakov_Ju.V.@tltsu.ru

 

Examined is relevance of a subject of work is caused by the continuing deterioration of dissertation works. Therefore, article purpose is to define the system reason of deterioration of training of the top skills by the analysis of contents and structure of theses. The main shortcomings of dissertations, and understanding of their structural elements by applicants of an academic degree by communication with them in the course of preparation and carrying out preliminary protection of these were analyzed. Results of the analysis were compared to requirements of classical methodology and to interpretation of these requirements in the methodical managements and in publications. The essential system reason of decline in quality of dissertation works is in their traditional unsystematic structure, whith investigation withdrawal from scientific methodology and particular leveling of motivation to the analysis of a condition of a question and the received results of researches and also to system

approach to the thesis, need of strengthening of methodological training of graduate students according to the uniform nation-wide program providing system approach to the organization of researches for all scientific specialties, and processing’s of the “Thesis and Abstract of the Thesis” standard according to classical requirements of scientific methodology and the system approach to dissertation work Is shown. The system scheme of the thesis, which can make a manual basis is the practical guide to organization and performance of dissertation work for training of graduate students and applicants is offered.

Key words: quality of theses, system approach, methodological training of graduate students, system scheme of the thesis.

 

References

  1. Klimov, E.A. (2002). On some undesirable traditions in the work of dissertation councils on pedagogical and psychological sciences. Bulleteen VAK. No. 1. P. 22–28. (In Russ.).
  2. Feldshteyn, D.I. (2008). About a condition and ways of improvement of quality of dissertational researches on pedagogics and psychology. Alma mater (Vestnik vyisshey shkoly). No. 1. P. 17–25 (In Russ.).
  3. Feldshteyn, D.I. (2011). Psychological and pedagogical dissertational research in the system of organization of modern scientific knowledge. Problems of modern education. No. 2. P. 11–27. (In Russ).
  4. Laptev, V.V., Pisareva S.A., Tryapitsyina A.P. (2013). Degree in Russia: Reality and Prospects. Higher education in Russia. No. 4. P. 27–36. (In Russ.).
  5. Bednyiy, B.I. (2013). The role and structure of educational training in a new type of graduate school. Higher education in Russia. No. 12. P. 78–88. (In Russ.).
  6. Porus, V.I. (2013). A degree as a curve mirror of Russian science. Higher education in Russia. No. 4. P. 44–54. (In Russ.).
  7. Ekho, Yu. (1996), Practical guide for anyone who writes diplomas, course, control, reports, abstracts, dissertations: success without unnecessary problems. Moscow: Metallurgy Publ, 120 p. (In Russ.).
  8. Yakimovich, B.A. Seletkov, S.G. (2013). Methodology of dissertation research as an academic discipline. Higher education in Russia, No. 12. P. 99–103. (In Russ.).
  9. Novikov, A.M. (1999). How to work on a thesis: a Guide for the novice teacher researcher, Moscow: Publishing House Aigues. 104 p. (In Russ.).
  10. Gershunsky, B.S. (1998). Philosophy of education, Moscow: Moscow psychological and social Institute, Flint, 432 p. (In Russ.).
  11. Gromkova, M.T. (2003). Psychology and pedagogics of professional activity. Moscow: UNITY-DANA publishing house, 415 p.
  12. Philosophical encyclopedic dictionary (1983). Moscow: Soviet encyclopedia, 840 p. (In Russ.).
  13. Popkov, V.N. Typical mistakes in the design of pedagogical dissertations in the field of physical culture. URL: http://www.strana-oz.ru/2002/7/istoriya-ponyatiya-nauka (accessed on: 15.04.2018). (In Russ.).
  14. Volkov, Yu.G. (2002). Thesis: preparation, defense, design: Practical guide. Moscow: Gardariki publ. 160 p. (In Russ.).
  15. Rayzberg, B.A. (2002). Dissertation and academic degree: a Handbook for job seekers. Moscow: Infra-M. Publ. 400 p. (In Russ.).
  16. Ruzavin, G.I. (1975). Methods of scientific research. Moscow: Myisl publ. 237 p. (In Russ.).
  17. Baskakov, A.Ya., Tulenkov, N.V. (2004). The methodology of scientific research. Kiev: MAUP publ. 216 p.
  18. Altshuller, G.S. (1985). Profession — search for a new. Kishinyov: Kartya Moldovenyaske publ. 196 p. (In Russ.).
  19. Leontev, A.N. (2001). Lectures on General Psychology. Moscow: Smyisl publ. 511 p. (In Russ.).
  20. Formation of the system of thinking in teaching: Textbook manual for high schools (2002). Moscow: YuNITI-DANA publ. 344 p. (In Russ.).
  21. Modern post-graduate studies and the fate of the Institute for Advanced Studies: a round table. (2014). Higher education in Russia. No. 7. P. 71–85. (In Russ.).
  22. GOST R 7.0.3–2006. Publications. Basic elements, terms and definitions. Introduced on 01.01.2007. Moscow: Standartinform 45 p. (In Russ.).
  23. Zaguzov, N.I. (2008). Encyclopedia of scientific attestation. Dictionary-reference of the main terms and concepts used in the preparation of dissertational research. Moscow: NP APO publ. P. 169–182.
  24. Muravyov, A. (2002). History of the concept of “science”. National notes. No. 4. URL: http://www.strana-oz.ru/2002/7/istoriya-ponyatiya-nauka 9 (accessed on: 15.04.2018). (In Russ.).
  25. Verbitsky, A.A. (2008). How to prepare a thesis for defense? Higher education today. No. 4. P. 54–59. (In Russ.).
  26. Zaguzov, N.I. (2007). The system of training and attestation of scientific and pedagogical personnel in Russia. Alma mater (Vestnik vysshei shkooly). No. 3. P. 24. (In Russ.).
  27. Akimova, T.A. (2003).Theory of Organization: Proc. manual for high schools. Moscow: YuNITI-DANA publ. 367 p. (In Russ.).
  28. Petrovskiy, A.V (2006). Psychology and time. St. Petersburg: Piter publ. 396. p. (In Russ.).
  29. Baryishnikov, N.V. (2013). Ways to improve the quality of dissertations on pedagogical and psychological sciences. Higher education in Russia. No. 8–9. P. 65–70. (In Russ.).
  30. GOST R 7.0.11–2011 “Thesis and the author’s abstract of the thesis. Structure and rules of registration”. Introduced on 13.12.2011. Moscow: Standartinform. 10 p. (In Russ.).
  31. GOST 1.0–2004. Standardization in the Russian Federation. Basic provisions. Moscow: Standartinform. 10 p. (In Russ.).
  32. Kuzin, F.A. (2001). PhD thesis. Method of writing, rules of registration and protection procedure. Practical manual for graduate and postgraduate students. Publ. 5 complemented. Moscow: Os-89 publ. 224 p. (In Russ.).
  33. Novikov, A.M. Object and structure of methodology. URL: http://www.methodolog.ru/method.htm (accessed on: 14.04.2018). (In Russ.).
  34. Grigorash, O.V. (2015). To upgrading of dissertations and optimization of work of dissertation advices. Scientific magazine of КubGAU. No. 113 (09). P. 156–173. URL: http//ej.kubagro.ru/2015//09/pdf/13/pdf
  35. Kazakov, Yu.V. (2010). A systematic approach to research work: a tutorial. Togliatti: TSU publ. 68 p. (In Russ.).
  36. Kazakov, Yu.V. (1985). Graduation project. Togliatti: Togliatti Polytechnic Institute, publ. 28 p. (In Russ.).
  37. Kazakov, Yu.V. (2001). System approach to the content of the thesis project in a technical university. Alma mater (Vestnik vysshey shkoly). No. 10. P. 17–19. (In Russ.).
  38. Kazakov, Yu.V. (2003). On the formulation of scientific novelty and conclusions in dissertations. Alma mater (Vestnik vysshey shkoly). No. 2. P. 30–36. (In Russ.).
  39. Kazakov, Yu.V. (2018). Master's thesis: educational-methodical manual for the performance of final qualification work. Togliatti: TSU publ. P. 59. (In Russ.).
  40. Kazakov, Yu.V. (2010). System approach to research work: a textbook. Togliatti: TSU publ. 68 p. (In Russ.).
  41. Ognev, A.O. (2008). Fundamentals of Systemology: Textbook. Allowance. 2 nd ed. Togliatti: TSU publ. P. 196. (In Russ.).