UDC 378:37.09
https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.10-19.068
O.V. Shelomentseva is Cand.Sci. (Biology), doc. e-mail: ov_shelom@mail.ru ; G.K. Kovaleva is Cand.Sci. (Biology), doc. e-mail: gulmirakovaleva@mail.ru ; G.V. Toropova is Cand.Sci. (Biology), doc. e-mail: toropova.kgmu@yandex.ru; and E.V. Fisher is student e-mail: zhora.fisher.99@bk.ru at Krasnoyarsk State Medical University n.a. Prof. V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky
Presented is description of chronomancy of interactive session as to working program on discipline of “Histology, Embriology and Cytology” of KrasSMU n.a. Prof. V.F. Voyno-Yasenetsky. Results of the questionnaire show attitude of students to using of interactive forms of training in educational process. Established is connection between such categories of questionnaire, as preparation for lesson, carrying out occupation and efficiency of development of theoretical material by trainees. As the result of the research, revealed is, that interactive classes contribute to development of thinking and analytical activities. Elaborated are both positive and negative sides of such forms of practical training lessons.
Key words: FGOS VPO, interactive forms of learning, general cultural competence, press conference, questionnaire, doctor.
References
1. Avdeeva, E.A., Drozdova, I.A. Student activity and modern pedagogical technologies in the educational process of higher education. Higher education in Russia. 2016. No. 1. P. 155–157.
2. Avdeeva, E.A., Kolesnikova, Yu.N. The need for new methodologies for humanities in Russia. Alma mater (Vestnik vysshei shkoly). 2016. No. 11. P. 59–62.
3. Artyukhov, I.P., Nikulina, S.U., Avdeeva, E.A., Gavrilyuk, O.A., Myagkova, E.G. The role and tasks of pedagogy in the context of modernization of higher medical education. Alma mater (Vestnik vysshei shkoly). 2017. No. 6. P. 5–9.
4. Gavrilyuk, O.A. Autonomously oriented educational environment of the university as the path to human development in education. In: Pedagogy and medicine in service of person. Krasnoyarsk, 2016. P. 47–50.
5. Gulakova, M.V., Kharchenko, G.I. Interactive methods of teaching at the University as a pedagogical innovation. URL: http://e–koncept.ru/2013/13219.htm
6. Zakharov, K.P. Pedagogy of higher education. Dialog interactive forms of learning. St.–Petersburg, 2016.
7. Kovaleva, G.K., Toropova, G.V., Shelomentseva, O.V., Avdeeva, E.A. Technology of positional training in classroom at medical university. Siberian medical review. 2014. No. 5. P. 102–105.
8. Loskutov, A.A., Olkhovsky, D.V. Generalization of pedagogical experience: conducting classes in interactive forms, problems and advantages. URL: http://www.science–education.ru/ru/article/view?id=28028
9. Molchanova, E.A. On the need to implement interactive forms in the educational work of university. Humanities and education. 2016. No. 3. P. 47–48.
10. Kaspina, R., Plotnikova, L. Interactive forms of training bachelors: case study and challenges. Procedia social and behavioral sciences. 2014. Vol. 152. P. 278–283.
.png)
