https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.02-19.083
V.Ya. Gelman is Dr.Sci. (Engineering), prof. at North-Western State Medical University n.a. I.I. Mechnikov e-mail: Viktor.Gelman@szgmu.ru
Discussed are problems of evaluating final qualification works of university students by state certifying commission on the base of personal experience of the author’s participation in work of these commissions. Existing practice of organizing activity of state certifying commissions at national universities was examined. Analysis of features of expert evaluation was carried out. Shortcomings of proposed methods of element-by-element scoring are shown. Theoretical and practical approaches to increasing efficiency of commission’s work on evaluation are analyzed. Also the paper reveals the most promising methods, using in organizing activity of commissions. A number of ways to improve their work are proposed.
Key words: state certifying commission, final qualification work, defense, evaluation, university.
References
1. FGOS of higher education of master’s degree in the direction of training 02.04.02 “Fundamental informatics and information technologies”. Approved by the order of Minobrnauka of the RF at August 23, 2017. No. 811.
2. FGOS of higher professional education in the direction of training (specialty) 090305 “Information and analytical security systems (qualification (degree) specialist”. Approved by the order of Minobrnauka of the RF at No. 56 of January 17, 2011.
3. FGOS of higher professional education in the field of training 230400 “Information systems and technologies qualification (degree) master. Approved by the order of Minobrnauka of the RF at 14.12.2009. No. 725.
4. The Bologna process: European and national qualifications frameworks. Moscow, 2009.
5. Kozmina, M.A. Technology of qualimetric estimation of final qualifying work in the university. Vestnik KSU n.a. N.A. Nekrasov. 2007. No. 2. P. 69–74.
6. Tatur, Yu.G. How to increase objectivity of measuring and evaluating results of education. Higher education in Russia. 2010. No. 5. P. 22–31.
7. Shabaeva, Yu.I. Group expert evaluation of importance of factors on the basis of using of pairwise comparison method. URL: http://www.ivdon.ru/uploads/article/pdf/IVD_109_Shabaeva.pdf_dde0d21c72.pdf
8. Trunina, A., Zvezdina, P. Rosobrnadzor suggested checking diplomas of bachelors for plagiarism. RBC. 2018.02.08.
9. Lysikov, B.G. On the 10-point system of knowledge assessment. Higher education in Russia. 2013. No. 12. P. 89–94.
10. Gelman, V.Ya. On some problems of opposing dissertations. Education and Science. 2018. No. 5. P. 185–198.
.png)
