Alma Mater
ISSN 1026-955X
Vestnik Vysshey Shkoly (Higher School Herald)
The best way to learn all about Higher Education

=

Opposition between academic and administrative staff in modern university

A.V. Kolycheva
80,00 Р

 

https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.01-19.076

 

 

A.V. Kolycheva is post-graduate student, junior researcher at NIU “Higher School of Economics” e-mail: avkolycheva@hse.ru

 

Presented is review on number of sources in English, discussing tension between representatives of managerial and academic ethos in modern universities. Basing on those publications and events, debating in mass media, the author is analyzing causes and ways for solving conflicts between two permanently opposed groups of university employees. Ideas suggested by the article may impulse further investigations of academic and managerial university identities, for deeper understanding the nature of academic professionals’ and professional managers’ conflicts.

Key words: university management, academic values, managerialism, conflict of identities, professionalization.

 

References

1.Abramov, R.N. Mansgerialism and academic profession. Conflict and interaction. Sociological researches. 2011. No. 7. Pp. 37–47.

2. Abramov, R., Gruzdev, I., Terentiev, E. Troubles and enthusiasm in discourses in academician world: international and Russian contexts. New literary survey. 2016. No. 2. Pp. 16–32.

3. Ridings, B. University in rungs. Minsk, 2009.

4. Sociology of professions. Moscow, 2012.

5. Albert, S., Whetten, D.A. Organizational identity, Research in organizational behavior, 1985.

6. Ashforth, B.E., Humphrey, R.H. Emotional labor in service roles: The influence of identity. Academy of management review, 1993. No. 1. Pp. 88–115.

7. Barnett, R. University knowledge in age of super-complexity, Higher education. 2000. No. 4. Pp. 409–422.

8. Blau, P.M. Formal theory of differentiation in organizations, In: American sociological review. 1970. Pp. 201–218.

9. Brown, A.D., Humphreys, M. Organizational identity and place: A discursive exploration of hegemony and resistance. Journal of management studies. 2006. No. 2. Pp. 231–257.

10. Chandler, A.D. The emergence of managerial capitalism, Business History Review. 1984. No. 4. Pp. 473–503.

11. Churchman, D. Institutional Commitments, Individual Compromises: Identity‐related responses to compromise in Australian university. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 2006. No. 1. Pp. 3–15.

12. Conway, M. Defining administrators and new professionals. 2000.

13. Conway, M., Dobson, I. Fear and loathing in university staffing, Higher Education Management and Policy. 2003. No. 3. Pp. 123–133.

14. Etzioni, A. Authority structure and organizational effectiveness. In: Administrative Science Quarterly. 1959. Pp. 43–67.

15. Foreman, P., Whetten, D.A. Members' identification with multiple-identity organizations, Organization Science. 2002. No. 6. Pp. 618–635.

16. Gornall, L. New professionals: Change and occupational roles in higher education, Perspectives: Policy & Practice in Higher Education. 1999. No. 2. Pp. 44–49.

17. Gornitzka, Å., Kyvik, S., Larsen, I.M. The bureaucratization of universities. Minerva. 1998. No. 1. Pp. 21–47.

18. Henkel, M. Academic values and the university as corporate enterprise, Higher Education Quarterly. 1997. No. 2. Pp. 134–143.

19. Hussey, T., Smith, P. The trouble with higher education: A critical examination of our universities. In: Routledge, 2012.

20. Ibarra, H. Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Administrative science quarterly. 1999. No. 4. Pp. 764–791.

21. The changing dynamics of higher education middle management, Springer Science & Business Media. 2010. Vol. 33.

22. Turner, F.M., Newman, J.H. The idea of a university. 1996.

23. Nixon, J. Professional identity and the restructuring of higher education. Studies in Higher education. 1996. No. 1. Pp. 5–16.

24. O’Neill, A., Meek, V.L. Academic Professionalism and the Self‐Regulation of Performance. Journal of Tertiary Education Administration. 1994. No. 1. Pp. 93–107.

25. Parker, M., Jary, D. The McUniversity: Organization, management and academic subjectivity. Organization. 1995. No. 2. Pp. 319–338.

26. Raelin, J.A. Clash of cultures. Boston, 1986.

27. Ravasi, D., Schultz, M. Responding to organizational identity threats: Exploring the role of organizational culture. Academy of management journal. 2006. No. 3. Pp. 433–458.

28. Sharrock, G. Why students are not (just) customers (and other reflections on life after George). Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 2000. No. 2. Pp. 149–164.

29. Slaughter, S., Leslie, L.L. Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997.

30. Szekeres, J. The invisible workers. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 2004. No. 1. Pp. 7–22.

31. Szekeres, J. General staff experiences in the corporate university. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 2006. No. 2. Pp. 133–145.

32. Trow, M. Reflections on the transition from elite to mass to universal access. In: International handbook of higher education. Netherlands, 2007. Pp. 243–280.

33. Whitchurch, C. The changing roles and identities of professional managers in UK higher education. Perspectives. 2007. No. 2. Pp. 53–60.

34. Whitchurch, C. Reconstructing Identities in Higher Education: The Rise of'third Space Professionals. Routledge, 2012.

35. Winter, R. Academic manager or managed academic? Academic identity schisms in higher education, Journal of higher education policy and management. 2009. No. 2. Pp. 121–131.

36. Wint1er, R., Sarros, J. The academic work environment in Australian universities: a motivating place to work? Higher Education Research & Development. 2002. No. 3. Pp. 241–258.

37 Wright, N. Leadership,‘bastard leadership’and managerialism: confronting twin paradoxes in the Blair education project, Educational Management & Administration. 2001. No. 3. Pp. 275–290.