Resource of education and breeding, that is forget. About using of results of research of quality of education

https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.1-18.013

A.N. Mayorov is Dr.Sci. (Pedagogy), prof. at Institute of Education of National Research University Higher School of Economics e-mail: mayorovan@list.ru

Analyzed are key problems, connected with using of results of evaluation of educational achievements of school persons by their parents. Context of the article consists in necessity of evaluation of entire specter of results of education, fixing in federal state educational standard. In the article presented are examples of various variants of attracting of parents to activity of bettering of quality of education, basing on results of studying of quality of education on different levels. The author shows substantiation of necessary changes into organization, analysis of data and spreading of results of both Russian national and regional programs of evaluation of quality of education.

Key words: quality of education, use of results of evaluation of educational achievements, parents of students, international experience, aims of education.

References

1. Analytical materials of results of national research of general education in 4th classes on subjects on “Russian language”, “Mathematic”, “Environment”. Federal organ on control in education & science, 2015. URL: https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/1a0110_f049fd9384efc98b3df73aadd69e.pdf
2. Analytical materials on results of national research of quality of mathematical education in 5 to 7th classes. Federal body on control in education & science, 2014-2015 URL: https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/1a0110_7ad5ae687d5c4a4cba9d37062f4f71cc.pdf
3. Waldman, I.A. Comparative analysis of experience in results of national monitoring in Australia, the USA and Chili. URL: http://www.pmedu. ru
4. Waldman, I.A. International experience of the use of national monitors of educational achievements: key aspects. In: Quality of education in Euro-Asia. Moscow, 2014.
5. State autonomous educational institution of applied professional education of the city of Moscow. URL: http://mcko.ru/pages/m_n_d_faq
6. Context factors, how to use them in education. URL: http://www.ug.ru/articl/742
7. Lingmann, A.B. Effeciency of data research of education for adoption decision on educational policy (analysis on example of research in school success PIRLS. Vestnik of Nizhny Novgorod university. Serie “Social sciences”. 2012, no. 4 (28), pp. 93–97.
8. Mayorov, A.N. Monitoring in education. Moscow, 2005.
9. Mayorov, A.N. Theory and practice of creation of tests for the system of education. Moscow, 2001.
10. Conducting of national evaluation of learning achievements. Moscow, 2014.
11. Project of conception of national researches in quality of education (NIKO). URL: https://www.eduniko.ru/-c20b5
12. Regional researches in quality of education URL: http://www.kursobr.ru/otkrytaya-lektsiya-kovalevag-s.html
13. Hocker, D. Systems of evaluation in England and Wells. URL: http://www.twirpx.com/file/1128776
14. Yastrebov, G.A., Pinskaya, M.A., Kosaretsky, S.G. Use of context data in the system of evaluation of quality of education: experience of formulating and approbating of instruments. Problems of education. 2014, no. 4, pp. 58–95.
15. Baron, J.B. 1999. Exploring High and Improving Achievement in Connecticut. URL: http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/negp/issues/publication/ othpress/body.pdf
16. Kellaghan, T., and Madaus, G.F. 2000. Outcome Evaluation. In Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation, 2nd ed., ed. D.L.
17. Kellaghan, T., and Greaney, V. 1992. Using Examinations to Improve Education: A Study in Fourteen African Countries. Washington, DC: World Bank.
18. Vegas, E., and Petrow, J. 2008. Raising Student Learning in Latin America: The Challenge for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: World Bank.
19. Wenglinksy, H. How schools matter. The link between teacher classroom practices and student 1academic performance. URL: http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n12