https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.11-17.117
D.S. Dzikevich is post-graduate student at Lomonosov Moscow State University
e-mail: dzvch@yandex.ru
Researched are conceptual processes, characteristic the practice of philosophical society of continental China (Chinese Peoples’ Republic) after elimination of ideological monopoly of official Marxism as theoretically dominating factor. Outlined aspects of philosophical discussions, approaches to interpretation of problem fields, and terminology in the process of their fundamental transformations. The author presents her opinion on corresponding problems, basing on her own experience of two academic probations at two leading universities of China. Material of the article might be of interest for all those, who is connected with study in theoretical language of philosophy of post-modernism and genesis of philosophical discourse in contemporary China.
Key words: contemporary Chinese philosophy, A.N. Whitehead, philosophy of process, post-modernism in modern Chinese philosophy.
References
1.Lyotard, J.-F. The state of post-modernism. Saint Petersburg, 1998.
2.Xiaoming, Chen. Post-modern break. Kuanmin, 2000, pp. 2–3.
3.Yuechuan, Van. Problem of categories of post-modernism and changes of terminology. URL: http://dadao.net/htm/culture/2001/0723/1520.htm
4.Henry Y.H. Zhao. Post-Isms and Chinese New Conservatism. New Literary History: Cultural Studies. China and the West. 1997. Vol. 28. No. 1.
5.Jencks Ch. Post-Modernism. The New Classicism in Art and Architecture. N.Y.: Rizzoli and L.: Academy, 1987.
.png)
