Alma Mater
ISSN 1026-955X
Vestnik Vysshey Shkoly (Higher School Herald)
The best way to learn all about Higher Education

=

Formation of scientific alliance in thesis academic guidance

L.B. Ershteyn, N.V. Volkova
80,00 Р

UDC 378

https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.07-22.068                      

 

L.B. Ershteyn,

Cand. Sc. (Pedagogy),

 Department of Medical and Biological Disciplines

 Glazov State Pedagogical Institute, Glazov;

Department of Information Technologies and Systems

Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University

e-mail: leoleo1972@mail.ru

N.V. Volkova,

Cand. Sc. (Philology), Associate Professor

Cross-cultural communication and translation Department

Bashkir State Pedagogical University n.a. M. Akmulla, Ufa

 

The subject matter of this article is the phenomenon of thesis academic guidance. It is claimed that academic guidance is one of the key factors of the successful defense of a thesis. Factors and conditions of scientific alliance formation are identified in this article. The material represents that scientific alliance formation depends on the trust between the postgraduate student and his advisor, on the one hand. On the other hand, it depends on the style of their work. Three styles of academic advisors’ work and postgraduate students’ style of work are identified and characterized. The correspondence of the style of work of the advisor and his postgraduate student is reasoned. The model of trust in academic guidance is formulated. The methods of the diagnostic assessment of work style, trust and scientific alliance by itself are shown in the article. It is stated that there may be formed three levels of scientific alliance: superficial, deep and very deep. A very deep level of scientific alliance is proved to continue through several generations. The article represents the authors’ experience in working with various advisors.

Key words: Academic guidance, thesis defense, postgraduate studies, guidance style, scientific alliance, trust.

 

References

  1. Albertyn, R., Kapp, C., Bitzer, E. (2008). Profiling exiting postgraduate students, performance and experiences. South African Journal of Higher Education, 22(4), 749–772. DOI: 10.4314/sajhe.v22i4.25814
  2. Affero, I., Abiddin, N.Z., Aminuddin, N. (2011). Improving the Development of Postgraduates' Research and Supervision. International Education Studies, 4, 1, 78–89
  3. Aithal, P., Kumar, S. (2018). Approaches to Confidence Building as a Primary Objective in Postgraduate Degree Programmes. International Journal of Applied Engineering and Management Letters (IJAEML), 2, 1. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1205185.
  4. Aithal, S., Kumar, P. (2019). What should be the objective of post graduate cources knowlege with skills? or knowlege with confidience? Conference: Impact of Ideas and Innovations on Management. IT, Education & Social Sciences, 93–100
  5. Bitzer, E.M, Albertyn, R.M. (2011). Alternative approaches to postgraduate supervision: A planning tool to facilitate supervisory processes. South African Journal of Higher Education, 25, 5, 875–888.
  6. Burnett, P.C. (1999). The Supervision of Doctoral Dissertations Using a Collaborative Cohort Model. Counselor Education and Supervision, 39, 46–52. DOI: 10.1002/j.1556-6978.1999.tb01789.x
  7. Burnett, P.C. (1999). “Counselor Education and Supervision”. ProQuest Psychology Journals. Sep 1999, 39, 1, 46–52.
  8. Chiang, S-Y. (2009). Personal power and positional power in a power-full ‘I’: a discourse analysis of doctoral dissertation supervision. Discourse & Communication, l3, 255–271. DOI: 10.1177/1750481309337199
  9. Conway, K. (2011). How Prepared are Students for Postgraduate Study? A Comparison of the Information Literacy Skills of Commencing Undergraduate and Postgraduate Information Studies Students at Curtin University. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 42:2, 121–135. DOI: 10.1080/00048623.2011.10722218
  10. Doloriert, C., Sambrook, S., Stewart, J. (2012). Power and emotion in doctoral supervision: Implications for HRD. European Journal of Training and Development, 36, 732-750. DOI: 10.1108/03090591211255566.
  11. Ezebilo, E. (2012). Challenges in Postgraduate Studies: Assessments by Doctoral Students in a Swedish University. Higher Education Studies, 2, 4, 49–57
  12. Harrison, S., Grant, C. (2015). Exploring of new models of research pedagogy: time to let go of master-apprentice style supervision? Teaching in Higher Education, 20:5, 556-566. DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2015.1036732
  13. Hemmings, B. (2012). Sources of Research Confidence for Early Career Academics. A Qualitative Study. Higher Education Research and Development, 31, 2.
  14. Horvath, A., Luborsky, L. (1993). The role of the therapeutic alliance in Psychotherapy. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 61, 561–573. DOI: 10.1037//0022-006X.61.4.561
  15. Hyland, K., Tse, P. (2004). “I would like to thank my supervisor”. Acknowledgements in graduate dissertations. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14, 2, 259–275.
  16. Ion, G., Iucu, R. (2016). The impact of postgraduate studies on the teachers’ practice. European Journal of Teacher Education, 39:5, 602–615. DOI:10.1080/02619768.2016.1253674
  17. Kaur, G., Kaur, S., Fook, C., Yunus, F. (2014) Postgraduate Supervision: Comparing Student Perspectives from Malaysia and the United Kingdom, Procedia. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 123, 2014, 151–159. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1409
  18. Krupnick, J., Sotsky, S., Simmens, S., Moyer, J., Elkin, I., Watkins, J., Pilkonis, P. (1996). The Role of the Therapeutic Alliance in Psychotherapy and Pharmacotherapy Outcome: Findings in the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 64. 532–539. DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.64.3.532
  19. Lee, A. (2018) How can we develop supervisors for the modern doctorate? Studies in Higher Education, 43:5, 878–890. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2018.1438116
  20. Lee, A., Kamler, B. (2008). Bringing pedagogy to doctoral publishing. Teaching in Higher Education, 13:5, 511–523. DOI: 10.1080/13562510802334723
  21. Lee, A. (2008). How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 33:3, 267–281. DOI: 10.1080/03075070802049202
  22. Lessing, A., Schulze, S. (2002) Postgraduate supervision and academic support : students' perceptions South African. Journal of Higher Education, 16, 2, 139–149.
  23. Lessing, N., Lessing, A. (2004) The supervision of research for dissertations and theses. Acta Commercii, 73–87.
  24. Löfström, E., Pyhältö, K. (2015). Ethics in the supervisory relationship: supervisors’ and doctoral students’ dilemmas in the natural and behavioural sciences. Studies in Higher Education, 42(4), 232–247. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1045475
  25. Mainhard, T., Rijst, R., Tartwijk, J., Wubbels, T. (2009). A model for the supervisor–doctoral student relationship. Higher Education, 58, 3, 359–373. DOI:10.1007/s10734-009-9199-8
  26. McCallin, A., Nayar, S. (2012). Postgraduate research supervision: a critical review of current practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 17:1, 63–74. DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2011.590979
  27. Momeni, M., Samimi, B., Afshari, M., Hasan, M., Mohammadi, J. (2011). Selection Process of Supervisor for Doctoral Dissertation Using Analytical Network Process (ANP): An Iranian Study. Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, 2(2), 63–71.
  28. Nasir, S., Masek, A. (2015). A Model of Supervision in Communicating Expectation Using Supervisory Styles and Students Learning Styles. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204, 265–271. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.150
  29. Olmos-López P., Sunderland, J.J. (2017).Doctoral supervisors’ and supervisees’ responses to co-supervision. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 41:6, 727–740. DOI: 10.1080/0309877X.2016.1177166
  30. Orellana, M.L., Darder, A., Pérez, A., Salinas, J. (2016). Improving doctoral success by matching PhD students with supervisors. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 87–103.
  31. Padmanabhan, M.C., Rossetto, C. (2017). Doctoral writing advisors navigating the supervision terrain. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54:6, 580–589. DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2017.1348961
  32. Paré, A. (2017). Re-thinking the dissertation and doctoral supervision / Reflexiones sobre la tesis doctoral y su supervisión, Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 40:3, 407–428. DOI: 10.1080/02103702.2017.1341102
  33. Parker-Jenkins, M. (2018). Mind the gap: developing the roles, expectations and boundaries in the doctoral supervisor–supervisee relationship. Studies in Higher Education, 43:1, 57–71. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2016.1153622
  34. Postareff, L., Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2011). Emotions and confidence within teaching in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 36:7, 799–813. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2010.483279
  35. Pyhältö, K., Vekkaila, J., Keskinen, J. (2012). Exploring the Fit between Doctoral Students’ and Supervisors’ Perceptions of Resources and Challenges. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7, 395–414. DOI: 10.28945/174
  36. Ray, S. (2007). Selecting a doctoral dissertation supervisor: analytical hierarchy approach to the multiple criteria problem? International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 2, 23.
  37. Seagram, B.C., Gould, J, Pyke, S.W. (1998) An Investigation of  Gender and other variables on time to completion of doctoral degrees. Research in Higher Education, 39, 319–335. DOI: 10.1023/A:1018781118312
  38. Sidhu, G., Kaur, S., Peck, C., Yuen, F. (2017). Developing a Framework for Postgraduate Supervision Empowering. 21st Century Learners Through Holistic and Enterprising Learning, 255–267.
  39. Tasir, Z., Abour, Khawla A., Halim, A., Harun, J. (2012). Relationship between Teachers’ ICT Competency, Confidence Level, and Satisfaction toward ICT Training Programmes: A Case Study among Postgraduate Students. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology — TOJET, 11, 1, 138–144.
  40. Tobbell, J., O’Donnell, V. (2013). Entering Postgraduate Study: A Qualitative Study of a Neglected Transition. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education, 4 (1).
  41. Tooba, R., Akram, R. (2020). An Empirical Investigation of Supervisory Management Styles and Associated Factors for Postgraduate Level Research Supervision. Pakistan Journal of Education, 36, 3. DOI: 10.30971/pje.v36i3.828
  42. Tooba, S., Nasir, M. (2018). Assessing the Quality of Supervision Experiences in the Different Research Stages at Postgraduate Level. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 5, 2, 8–27.
  43. Wang, L., Byram, M. (2019). International doctoral students’ experience of supervision: a case study in a Chinese university. Cambridge Journal of Education, 49:3, 255–274. DOI: 10.1080/0305764X.2018.1518405
  44. Wisker, G., Robinson, G., Trafford, V., Warnes, M., Creighton, E. (2003). From Supervisory Dialogues to Successful PhDs: Strategies supporting and enabling the learning conversations of staff and students at postgraduate level. Teaching in Higher Education, 8:3, 383–397. DOI: 10.1080/13562510309400
  45. Wozniak, H., Mahony, M.J., Lever, T., Pizzica, J. (2009). Stepping through the orientation looking glass: A staged approach for postgraduate students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(2). DOI: 10.14742/ajet.1151
  46. Yim, L., Waters, L. (2013). The role of interpersonal comfort, attributional confidence, and communication quality in academic mentoring relationships. Education Research and Perspectives, 40, 58–85.