Conditions for development and realization of educational programs of new generation

https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.07-17.006

A.P. Isaev is Dr.Sci. (Economy), doc., prof. at sub-faculty e-mail: ap_isaev@mail.ru; L.V. Plotnikov is Cand.Sci. (Technique), doc. e-mail: leonplot@mail.ru ; and N.I. Fomin is senior lecturer e-mail: nnimoff@mail.ru

at Ural Federal University n.a. first president of Russia B.N. Yeltsin

Presented are results of research of requirements to educational programms at university, qualitatively improving the level of their demand. The authors developed the model of educational program of next generation, based on the analysis of experience of “International Society for Engineering Pedagogy” and CDIO conception, as well as requirements for lecturers, able to develop and implement such model in educational process of university. The article presents data poll of young lecturers and expert lecturers on need and importance of EP of next generation, as well as on readiness of educational departments, where they work, to implement such in the process of training graduates of bachelorship and mastership. Also presented are qualification characteristics of university lecturers, as well as requirements for methodological tools for monitoring of educational process.

Key words: education program, competence of lecturer, methodological tools, monitoring of educational process, educational culture.

References

1. Tutwiler, S.W., deMarrais, K., Gabbard, D., Hyde, A., Konkol, P., Li, H., Medina, Y., Rayle, J., & Swain, A. Standards for Academic and Professional Instruction in Foundations of Education, Educational Studies, and Educational Policy Studies Third Edition, 2012, Draft Presented to the Educational Community by the American Educational Studies Association's Committee on Academic Standards and Accreditation. Educational Studies. 2013, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 107–118.
2. Zafoschnig, A. The Development of the new ING.PAED.IGIP Curriculum into an Umbrella for Modularised National and Regional Engineering Education Curricula. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy. 2014, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 32–36.
3. Re-thinking of engineering education. Approach by CDIO. Moscow, 2015.
4. Isaev, A.P., Plotnikov, L.V. Educational engineering in the context of realization of ideology of CDIO. Higher education in Russia. 2016, no. 12 (207), pp. 45–52.
5. Competence approach in educational process of high school: projecting and organization. Moscow, 2013.
6. Blinov, A.O. Key competences are subject of discussion in the whole world. Alma mater (Vestnik vysshei shkoly). 2012, no. 12, pp. 15-19.
7. Baxter, M.В. Learning that Lasts: Integrating Learning, Development, and Performance in College and Beyond (review). The Journal of Higher Education. 2002, vol. 73, no 5, pp. 660-666.
8. Sazonov, B.A. Individually oriented educational process is the way to individualization of education. Alma mater (Vestnik vysshei shkoly). 2011, no. 8, pp. 12-18.
9. Solberg, V. S., Phelps, L. A., Haakenson, K. A., Durham, J. F. & Timmons, J. The nature and use of individualized learning plans as a career intervention strategy. Journal of Career Development. 2012, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 500-514.
10. Isaev, A.P., Valueva, L.V., Martynova, E.V., Plotnikov, L.V. Instrument for evaluating and raising of effectiveness of current educational process at high school. Alma mater (Vestnik vysshei shkoly). 2016, no. 2, pp. 77-83.