I.B. Avdeeva is doct. in Pedagogy,
prof. at Moscow Automobile and Roads State Technical University (MADI)
E-mail: i.b.avdeyeva@mail.ru
Examined is the phenomenon of analytical cognitive style of thinking, characterizing specialists of engineering profile during the process of training in Russian language as foreign one. Analyzed is history of the problem of cognitive style of thinking. Presented is survey of both foreign and national sources of information on cognitivistics. Shown are parameters of cognitivity with determination of universal and special cognitive styles. Also described is lingua cognitive portrait of foreign students of engineering profile. Substantiated are some recommendations for exposure of students with potential cognitive style of thinking during the process of educational training, and also presented are basic methods of corresponding to them technics of supervision. Also determined are task of lecturers as to orientation of foreign students of engineering profile towards cognitive style.
Key words: cognitivistics, cognitive styles, cognitive dissonance, foreign students of engineering profile, cognitive style of foreign students of engineering profile, cognitive characteristics, specialization of left semi-sphere, lingua cognitive portrait of foreign students of engineering profile.
References
1. Medvedeva, I.L. Psychological linguistic aspects of functioning foreign word. — Tver, 1999..
2. Klimov, E.A. Image of world in different types professions. — M.: MGU, 1995.
3. Avdeeva, I.B. Orientation towards cognitive style in the process of training in Russian language of students of engineering profile // World of Russian word. — 2000. — No. 3. — P. 33–41.
4. Avdeeva, I.B. Methodic for training in Russian language of students of engineering profile: phenomenon of déjà vu // World of Russian word. — 2002. — No. 4. — P. 51–57.
5. Avdeeva, Irina. Engineering communication as independent language culture // 2012 (ISBN 978-3-8484-28-92-2) project 46120, LAP LAMBERT Academic Publ. GmbH & Co. — Saarbrucken, Germany.
6. Coady J. L2 vocabulary acquisition: A syntheses of the research // Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition: A Rationale for Pedagogy. — Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1997. — P. 273–290.
7. Kornilova, T.V., Paramei, G.V. Approaches to studying of cognitive styles: twenty years later // Problems of psychology. — 1989. — No. 6. — Р. 140–147.
8. Demiankov, V.Z. Cognitive linguistics as variety of integrative approach // Problems of linguistics. — 1994. — No. 4. — P. 27.
9. Adler А. Understanding Human Nature. — New York, 1927.
10. Allport, G.W. Personality: A Psychological Interpretation. — New York: Holt., 1937.
11. Rorschach, H. Die Psychodyagnostik. — Bern, 1921.
12. Vartegg, R. Reflexological Profile. — New York, 1939.
13. Klein, G.S. The personal world through perception // Perception: an approach to personality. — New York: Ronald, 1951.
14. Gardner, R.W. Cognitive style in categorizing behavior // Journal of Personality. — 1953. — Vol. 22. — P. 214–233.
15. Morosanova, V.I. Individual style of self-regulation: phenomenon, structure & functions as to spontaneous activity of person. — M., 2001.
16. Kholga, V.A. Possible worlds of cognitive styles // Cognitive styles: Thesis of scientific practical conference. — Tallinn, 1986. — P. 32–37.
17. Klimov, E.A. Image of the world in varied professions. — M., 1995.
18. Kholodnaya, M.A. Cognitive styles as manifestation of originality of individual intellect. — Kiev, 1990.
19. Klimov, E.A. Individual style in activity, dependent on typical characteristics of the nervous system. — Kazan, 1969. — P. 277.
20. Gavrilova, T.A., Khoroshevsky, V.F. Knowledge depot of intellectual systems. — SPb., 2000.
21. Liver, B.L. Methodic for individualized training in foreign language, tacking into account influence of cognitive styles on the process of it’s assimilability: Abstr. diss. … cand. ped. sciences. — M., 2000.
.png)
