Communication in the condition of networking society: Potential of actor-networking interaction

UDC 316.4-042.3:004

DOI 10.20339/AM.02-24.030

Anna Yu. Kvas, PhD student of the Department of Theoretical and Social Philosophy, National Research Saratov State University, ORCID: 0009-0002-0744-8732, e-mail: kvasann@yandex.ru

Introduction. One of the most important conditions for the existence of a network as an organizing principle of social existence is the process of multidimensional communications. Networks, as opposed to hierarchical systems, make their existence possible only in the discourse of interactive communications. Main part. In the article, the author offers a socio-philosophical analysis of the existence of communication in a networked society from various methodological positions. In the course of the study, it becomes clear that the networking of communications transforms them at various levels: digital, socio-political, anthropological, ethical. Conclusion. In the conclusion of the article, the author concludes that in the conditions of a network society, communication processes are undergoing serious changes. The multidimensionality and openness of the communication systems of the network society are directly determined by the very nature of the network, its plasticity, flexibility and variability, which we observe today.

Keywords: network, network society, communication in society, dynamics of society

References

1. Castells, M. The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business and Society. Ekaterinburg: U-Factoria, 2004. 328 p.
2. Andramonova, V.V. Network society: modern paradigm of development. System of values of modern society. 2015. No. 42. P. 123–126.
3. Castells, M. The power of communication. Moscow: Publishing house. House of the Higher School of Economics, 2016. 564 p.
4. Obukhov, K.N. Network as a social structure: a model of network communication in the theory of M. Castells. Vestnik of the Udmurt University. Series “Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy”. 2008. No. 1. P. 107–110.
5. Egorov, M.V. The role of communications in the modern network society. Vestnik of the University. 2015. No. 7. P. 214–217.
6. Bell, D. The coming post-industrial society: the experience of sociological forecasting. Moscow: Academia. 2004. 788 p
7. Castells, M., Kiseleva, E. Russia and the network community. World of Russia. 2000. No. 1. P. 23–51.
8. Inozemtsev, V.L. Modern post-industrial society - nature, contradictions, prospects. Moscow: Logos. 2000. 302 p
9. Demina, N.A. Specifics of the network approach in education. System of values of modern society. 2014. No. 34. P. 114–118.
10. Ustyantsev, V.B. Risks in the space of power: concepts and projects. Logos et Praxis. 2011. No. 2. P. 106–112.
11. Vasechko, E.N. Jurgen Habermas and his theory of communicative action. Philosophy of Law. 2012. No. 5 (54). P. 75–78.
12. Tormosheva, V.S. The phenomenon of communication in Russian philosophy of the 21st century. Vestnik of TSPU. 2013. No. 5. P. 49.
13. Strizoe, A.L. The power of risk and the risks of power. Vlast’. 2012. No. 3. P. 16–20.
14. Anikin, D.A. Network structures of the past: from the politics of memory to the politics of oblivion. Society. Human. Risks. Saratov: Science. 2017. P. 3–7.
15. Savrutskaya, E.P. The problem of communication in German philosophy of the twentieth century (J. Habermas, N. Luhmann, K. Apel). Vestnik of the Nizhny Novgorod University n.a. N.I. Lobachevsky. 2010. No. 3. P. 364–368.
16. Gladkova, Z.V. Differentiation of conceptual interpretations of the concept “Communication” in modern philosophy. Scientific Bulletin of MSTU GA. 2011. No. 166. P. 71–76.
17. Danilov, S.A. ‘Black Swan’ by N. Taleb as a philosophical reflection of a risky society. Izvestiia of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy. 2018. No. 2. P. 122–126.