UDC 378:159.9
https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.05-23.056
Olga V. Andryushkova, Ph.D. of Chemical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Laboratory of Methods of Teaching Chemistry of the Department of General Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Lomonosov Moscow State University, e-mail: o.andryushkova@gmail.com
Natalia L. Abramycheva, Ph.D. of Chemical Sciences, Associate Professor, Faculty of Chemistry, Lomonosov Moscow State University, e-mail: nataliacat@mail.ru
Anastasia I. Adaykina, student, Faculty of Chemistry, Lomonosov Moscow State University, e-mail: anastasya.adajkina@yandex.ru
The article deals with the issues of correspondence between the psychotype of students and the model of organizing the educational process in the disciplines of the chemical profile for non-chemical majors at university. The basic and secondary criteria that affect the level of student’s learning are considered. Based on the theory of personality by Jung, in which a model of psychological types was proposed, and using the questionnaire survey of students according to the Myers-Briggs method, an attempt was made to determine the psychotype of the “average” student in order to draw up recommendations for the formation of the educational process.
Keywords: quality of learning, learning criteria, Ishikawa diagram, student’s psychotype, chemistry education
References
1. Kuzmina, N.V. Research methods of pedagogical activity. Leningrad: LSU, 1970.
2. Ostapenko, A. A. N.V. Kuzmina’s Theory of Pedagogical System: Genesis and Implications. Person. Community. Management. 2013. No. 4. P. 37–52.
3. Kruglov, V.I., Gorlenko, O.A., Mozhaeva, G.V. Formation and Development of Educational Institutions Quality Systems. Higher Education in Russia. 2015. No. 12. P. 46–51.
4. Skok, G.B. How to Analyse Your Own Pedagogical Activity: Textbook. Moscow: Pedagogical Education of Russia, 2001. 102 p.
5. Andryushkova, O., Grigoriev, S. The Influence of Online Learning Quality Criteria Selection on Negentropy. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings. Aachen, 2020. V. 2770. P. 127–139.
6. Ishikawa/Ishikawa Causal Diagram. URL: http://www.up-pro.ru/encyclopedia/diagramma-isikavy.html
7. Andryushkova, O.V., Grigoriev, S.G. Transformation of Online Learning Quality Criteria. In. Pedagogical Education in Modern Russia: Strategic Development Guidelines. Rostov-n/D.: SFU Press, 2020. P. 278–299.
8. Ankudinova, S.A., Nepochatykh, I.A. The influence of personality psycho-type on the choice of communication strategy by students — future teachers. Eurasian Union of Scientists. 2018. No. 3-5 (48). P. 5–8.
9. Aniskina, M.S. Psychological types of students when studying in a technical university (by the example of Moscow Polytechnic University). Bulletin of the Association of Tourism and Service Universities. 2017. V. 11. No. 1. P. 34–44.
10. Meral, Pera, Aylin, Beyoğlu. Personality types of students who study at the departments of numeric, verbal and fine arts in education faculties. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2011. 12. Р. 242–247.
11. Hernández-Hernández, M.E. et al. Measurement of the Jungian Psychological Types in Mexican university students. Acta de Investigación Psicológica. 2017. Vol. 7. P. 2635–2643.
12. Minyurova, S.A. Psychology of self-knowledge and self-development: tutorial Ekaterinburg: Ural State Pedagogical University, 2012. 320 p.
13. Jung, K.G. Psychological types / ed. Zelensky; trans. S. Laurie. St. Petersburg: Azbuka, 2001. 718 p.
14. Sharpe, D. Personality Types: Jungian Typological Model / translated from English by V.V. Zelensky. Ed. 3th revised. Moscow: Dobrosvet, Gorodets Publishing House, 2016. 220 p.
15. Minakhmetova, A.Z., Akhmetshina, E.N. The study of psychological type of subjects of the educational process. Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogy. 2016. No. 2. P. 94–96.
16. Smirnova A.A. The linguistic personality of the character of a literary work and the psycho-type of a person (on the example of the works of M.A. Bulgakov): autoref. diss. Candidate of Philological Sciences. Мoscow, 2011.
17. Kazymova, O.N., Glukhenkiy, I.Yu. The Influence of Teacher’s Psycho-type on the Quality of Education. Philological and Socio-Cultural Issues of Science and Education. Proceedings of the IV International Scientific-Practical Part-time Conference. Krasnodar, 2019. P. 1054–1059.
18. Ushakov, R.A. Profiling in the system of management of pedagogical staff of general educational organization. Master-class. 2021. No. 4. P. 10–20.
19. Lychko A.E. Psychopathy and Character Accentuations at Teenagers. St. Petersburg, 2009, 256 p.
20. Isabel Briggs Myers with Peter B. Myers. Gift Differing. Moscow: Consulting Psychologist Press, Inc., 1995 (translated by A.P. Tikhonov).
.png)
