UDC 37(091)"1960/1980"
https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.04-21.042
T.A. Zhdanova is Cand. Sci. (Pedagogy), Ass. Prof. at Pacific State University e-mail: nadya_funny98@mail.ru
Discussed is genesis of the complex phenomenon of “student’s personality activity in learning” with formation of the terminological apparatus of higher school didactics. The student’s personal activity in learning is necessary condition for development of his personality and a fundamental principle of pedagogical activity. To reform the modern practice of the educational process, the idea of activity needs theoretical and technological researches, while the scientific fund could be significantly enriched with theoretical experience of the past.
Key words: personal activity, reproductive activity, productive activity, creative activity, intellectual activity, cognitive activity, independence, cognitive independence, independent cognitive activity, creative independence, professional independence, creativity.
References
1. Svirsky, V.Ya. Actual questions of creativity in the educational process of the Soviet higher school. Moscow, 1977. P. 34.
2. Bogoyavlenskaya, D.B. Method of research of intellectual activity. Question of psychology. 1971. No. 1. P. 32–36.
3. Bogoyavlenskaya, D.B. About the method of diagnostics of intellectual activity. Materials of the 4th All-Union Congress of the society of psychologists. Tbilisi, 1971. P. 95–96.
4. Bogoyavlenskaya, D.B., Petukhova, I.A. Mental abilities as a component of intellectual activity. Psychological research of intellectual activity. Moscow, 1979. P. 157.
5. Gritsenko, L.I. On the importance of goal setting in the educational process for the development of cognitive independence of students. Education of students’ cognitive activity in the complex interaction of educational and extracurricular forms of work. Barnaul, 1978. P. 13–15.
6. Research of methods of active training in the system of various forms of organization of training sessions. T.V. Kudryavtsev (еd.). Report on the Research work of the research Institute of higher education. Moscow, 1978. P. 23.
7. Kolmykova, Z.I. Psychological principles of training development. Moscow, 1979. P. 48.
8. Krupnov, A.I. Question of philosophy. 1970. No. 6. P. 65–68.
9. Leitis, N.S. Mental abilities and age. Moscow, 1971. P. 279.
10. Lerner, I.Ya. Didactic foundations of teaching methods. Moscow, 1981. P. 56.
11. Method of intellectual activity research. Problems of Psychology, 1971. No. 2. P. 78–79.
12. Nizamov, R.A. Didactic bases of activation of educational activity of students. Kazan. 1975. P. 34.
13. Ponomarev, L.A. Psychology of creativity. Moscow, 1976.
14. Skatkin, M.N. Activation of cognitive activity of students in training. Proceedings of the scientific conference on didactics. Moscow, 1965. P. 6.
15. Smirnova, E.E., Kalinicheva, Z.V., Kondratovich, N.V. On some areas of research on the effectiveness of training highly qualified specialists. In: Psychological characteristics of students in a technical University. Novosibirsk, 1975. P. 172–176.
.png)
