https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.03-18.037
G.I. Lovetsky is Dr.Sci. (Philosophy), prof., head of sub-faculty e-mail: lovetskiy@icloud.com; and M.A. Maksimov is Cand. Sci. (Philosophy), doc. e-mail: mikecloud@mail.ru at Kaluga branch of Bauman Moscow State Technical University
Presented is socio-philosophical analysis of natural mechanisms of creative thinking of modern engineer. Noted is, that the need to implant in training of engineering personnel of very modern achievements of science and technologies involves formation of special characteristics of creative thinking as condition for accelerated scientific, technological and cultural development of the state. The authors analyzed scientific, philosophical and psychological pedagogical background, and also formulated proposals for more complete consideration of natural mechanisms of creative thinking in university practice of educational and scientific research activities of future engineers.
Key words: training of engineers, technicology, methods of cognition, creative thinking, natural mechanisms.
References
1. Agatsi, E. The moral dimension of science and technology. Moscow, 1998.
2. Argamakova, A.A. Social humanitarian measurement of techno-science. Epistemology and philosophy of science. 2017, no. 2, pp. 120–136.
3. Gordienko, A.A. Person, challenges of NBICS convergence and science. Philosophy of education. 2016, no. 3, pp. 25–36.
4. Gorokhov, V.G. New trends in the philosophy of technology. Problems of philosophy. 2014, no. 1, pp. 178–183.
5. Ioas, H. Creativity of action. St. Petersburg, 2005.
6. Kanke, V.A. Philosophy of pedagogy. Moscow, 2011.
7. Kanke, V.A. The Rises and Fall of the Geniuses of Science: Workshop on the Methodology of Science. Obninsk, 2016.
8. Kanke, V.A. Methodology and Ethics of Nuclear Power. Moscow, 2017.
9. Kasavin, I.T. Cognition and Creativity. Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. 2010, no. 2, pp. 5–16.
10. Kudrin, B.I. Ontology of Technical Reality. Philosophical Sciences. 2017, no. 6, pp. 96–103.
11. Penrose, R. The new mind of the king. On computers, thinking and laws of physics. Moscow, 2003.
12. Rakitov, A.I. Prolegomena to the idea of technology. Problems of Philosophy. 2011, no. 1, pp. 3–14.
13. Shitov, S.B. Features of the paradigm of innovative engineering education in the information society. Alma mater (Vestnik vysshei shkoly). 2014, no. 3, pp. 30–34.
14. Yudin, B.G. Techno-science and “human improvement”. Epistemology and philosophy of science. 2016, no. 2, pp. 18–27.
15. Yastreb, N.A. Epistemology of a technical object. Philosophy of Science. 2013, no. 2, pp. 123–133.
16. Garreau, J. Radical evolution: The promise and peril of enhancing our minds, our bodies, and what it means to be human. N.Y., 2005.
17. Lewontin, R.C. Facts and the Factitious in Natural Sciences. In: Questions of Evidence. Proof, Practice, and Persuasion across the Diciplines. Chicago; London, 1994.
18. Marshack, A.A. Middle Paleolithic Symbolic Composition From the Golan Heights: The Earliest Known Image. Current Anthropology. 1996, no. 2, pp. 357–365.
.png)
