Valeriy I. Nikiforov,
E-mail: valerii.nikiforov@gmail.com
Alexander V. Rechinskiy
E-mail: alexander.rechinsky@spbstu.ru
Saint-Petersburg State Polytechnic University
The concept of “categorical multiple-meaning of a term” is defined. Shown is that introduction of such terms into technical texts brings to negative adoption of curriculum materials by students. Conclusion on the necessity of creation of standards on terminology is drawn.
Key words: term, definition, categorical multiple-meaning, technological base, conceptual emptiness, standard on terminology
References
1. Ozerov L. Emergency Stock. – Moscow, 1990, p. 5.
2. Gomoiunov K.K. Improvement of teaching of General scientific and Technical Disciplines. – St.Petersburg: St.Petersburg State Polyechnic University Press, 1993. – 252 pp.
3. Ozhegov S.I. Russian Language Dictionary / Ed. Shvedova N.U. – Moscow: Russian Language, 1987. – 797 pp.
4. Kudriavtsev V.N. Machine Elements. – Leningrad: Mashinostroenie, 1980. – 464 pp.
5. Constructional Materials Technology / Ed. Dalskiy A.M. – Moscow, Mashinostroenie, 1985 – 448 pp.
6. Matalin A.A. Technology of Machine Building. – Leningrad: Mashinostroenie, 1985. – 496 pp.
7. Illustrated Explanatory Dictionary of Russian Scientific and Technical Lexis / Ed. Maksimov V.I. – Moscow: Russian Language, 1994. – 800 pp.
8. Logic / Ed. Levin G.A. – Minsk: Belorussian State University Press, 1974. – 326 pp.
.png)
