Alma Mater
ISSN 1026-955X
Vestnik Vysshey Shkoly (Higher School Herald)
The best way to learn all about Higher Education

=

Nature of theoretical abstractions in science: the problem of their objectivation

Khmelevskaya Svetlana Anatolievna, M.G. Kosov, G.D. Volkova
80,00 Р

 

Khmelevskaya Svetlana Anatolievna

The doctor of Philosophy, professor of the department of philosophy of natural faculties

Lomonosov Moscow State University

E-mail: filosofya@mail.ru

 

Kosov Michael Georgievich

The doctor of Engineering, professor of the department «Automated information processing systems and managements»

«Moscow State University of Technology «STANKIN».

E-mail: grishena@mail.ru

 

Volkova Galina Dmitrievna

The doctor of Engineering, professor of the  department «Information technologies and computing systems»

«Moscow State University of Technology «STANKIN»

E-mail: cog-par@yandex.ru 

Examined are both instrumentalist and essentialist approaches to justifying of the need for theoretical abstractions in science, and also complexity and diversity of such abstractions as applied to empirical reality is shown. Substantiated is the necessity of introducing of interpretative proposals in science.

Key words: theoretical abstractions, empirical level of science, theoretical level og science, interpretative proposals, idealization, productive imagination.

 

References

 

  1. Hempel, K. Logic of explanation. — M.: House Intell. Books, 1998.

  2. Ilyin, V.V. Philosophy and history of science. — M.: MSU Publ., 2005.

  3. Carnap, R. Philosophical foundations of physics. — M.: Progress Publ., 1971.

  4. Lebedev, S.A., Ilyin, V.V., Lazarev, F.V., Leskov, L.V. Introduction into history and philosophy of science. — M.: Academic project Publ., 2005.

  5. Lebedev, S.A. Philosophy of science. — M.: Yurait, 2013.

  6. Pavlenko, A.N. Stage of weightlessness of empirical theory and ad hoc argumentation // Philosophy of Science: Issue 4. — M.: IFRAN Publ., 1998. — P. 108—118.

  7. Stepin, V.S. Philosophy of science. General problems. — M.: Gardariki, 2006.

  8. Khmelevskaya, S.A. Philosophical foundations of superstring theory // Philosophy of Physics. Actual problems. — M.: LENAND Publ., 2010. — Р. 376380.

  9. Yablokova, N.I., Khmelevskaya, S.A. On the dispute of realists and antirealists in contemporary philosophy of science // Theory and practice of social development. — 2012. — No. 4. — P. 20—24.

  10. Fraassen, В.С., van. The Scientific Image. — Oxford Univ. Press, 1980.

  11. Weinberg, St. The First Three Minutes. — N.-Y.: Basic Books, 1973.

  12. [URL]: http://arXiv:physics/0102051