UDC 1:378:316.35
DOI 10.20339/AM.05-24.020
Nikolay N. Gubanov, Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Docent, Professor of sub-faculty of Humanities at Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, e-mail: gubanovnn@mail.ru
The article provides a socio-philosophical analysis of intellectual communities as a special kind of collective unity. Everyday ideas about who intellectuals are reconstructed and their insufficiency for scientific discourse is revealed. The definition of intellectuals given by R. Collins is given and the need for its further clarification and development is shown. An original theory of intellectual activity is presented, which is based on the procedural concept of rationality developed by the author. Its core is the so-called a broadly understood principle of sufficient reason, which receives a transcendental-pragmatic justification in the article. It has been demonstrated that activities consistent with this principle are a factor constituting intellectual communities. Within the framework of the approach developed in the article, intellectuals are understood as people participating in the systematic production of new rational knowledge. An original hypothesis has been put forward about the fractal nature of the process of producing rational knowledge. The characteristics of intellectuals as a social group are given from the point of view of the sociological canon presented by P. Sorokin in his “System of Sociology”. As an important logical consequence of the views developed in the article, the following generalized position is recorded: the education system acts as the primary, basic, universal environment for the formation of intellectual mentality.
Keywords: intellectuals, intellectual mentality, intellectual communities, procedural concept of rationality, education, rational knowledge
References
1. Zvereva, G.I. (2018). Intellectual history in modern Russia: institutions and directions. Prepodavatel’ XXI vek. No. 4–2. P. 288–302.
2. Sorokin, P.A. (1993). System of Sociology. Vol. 2. Social analytics: The doctrine of the structure of complex social aggregates. Moscow: Nauka, 688 p.
3. Collins, R. (2002). Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change. Novosibirsk: Siberian Chronograph, 1280 p.
4. Ivin, A.A. (2000). Theory of argumentation. Moscow: Gardariki, 416 p.
5. Gubanov, N.N., Gubanov, N.I. (2022). The Apollo challenge model as a means of studying intellectual history. Dialog so vremenem. No. 81. P. 49–66.
6. Gubanov, N.N., Gubanov, N.I. (2022). Education as the supporting structure of the knowledge society. Alma mater (Vestnik vysshey shkoly). No. 10. P. 30–38. DOI: 10.20339/AM.10-22.030
7. Habermas, Yu. (2001). Moral consciousness and communicative action. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 382 p.
8. Gubanov, N.I., Gubanov, N.N. (2021). The problem of practical discourse: the justification of moral norms. Vestnik Slavyanskikh kul’tur. No. 62. P. 129–142. DOI: 10.37816/2073-9567-2021-62-129
9. Lebedev, S.A. (2024). Philosophy and methodology of science: current problems. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta, 575 p.
10. Gubanov, N.N. (2023). Parity of technical and humanitarian potentials of society as a factor of its sustainable development. Alma mater (Vestnik vysshey shkoly). No. 8. P. 15–23. DOI: 10.20339/AM.08-23.015
11. Gubanov, N.N. (2023). Lecture as a means of translating cultural capital and reproduction of intellectual elite. Vestnik Slavyanskikh kul’tur. No. 69. P. 24–36. DOI: 10.37816/2073-9567-2023-69-24-36
12. Gubanov, N.N., Gubanov, N.I. (2021). History of scientific ideas through the prism of philosophical ideas. Dialog so vremenem. No. 76. P. 5–19. DOI: 10.21267/AQUILO.2021.76.76.026
.png)
