UDC 378
https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.03-22.046
Victor P. Soloviev, Cand. Sci (Technic), Professor at NUST MISIS, e-mail: solovjev@mail.ru
Tatiana A. Pereskokova, Cand. Sci. (Pedagogy), Associate Professor at Institute — Brunch of RGGRU (MGRI) in Stary Oskol
The problem of modernization of federal state educational standards, which no longer meet the requirements of the sphere of labor, is considered. It is proposed to use a common approach to the training of an engineer and a bachelor of engineering and technology, whose competencies are reduced in a broad sense to the ability to research, design and manage. The general professional and professional competencies of a graduate of this field (specialty) should be formulated in the main educational program of each university. It is recommended to develop educational standards for the levels of training for the relevant fields of activity (science, technology, pedagogy, medicine, etc.). The need to improve the management system of training for the modern economy is shown.
Key words: professional education, educational standard, educational program, competencies, quality, management.
References
1. Bordovsky, G.A. Education as an image of the future. Higher education today. 2021. No. 4. P. 2–7.
2. Korshunov, S.V. To the system of standardization of education in the Russian Federation — a quarter of a century. Higher education in Russia. 2018. No. 3. P. 23–36.
3. Soloviev, V.P., Pereskokova, T.A. Vocational education: current state and new approaches. Economics in industry. Journal of industrial Economics. 2021. Vol. 14. No. 1. P. 130–140.
4. Rudskoy, E.I., Borovikov, A.I., Romanov, P.I. The concept of the fourth-generation FGOS for the engineering field of education in the context of fulfilling the instructions of the President of Russia. Higher education in Russia. 2021. No. 4. P. 72–84.
5. Kuzminov, Ya.I., Yudkevich, M.M. Universities in Russia: how it works. Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics, 2021. 616 p.
6. Senashenko, V.S. Levels of coupling of the higher education system and the sphere of labor. Higher education in Russia. 2018. No. 3. P. 38–47.
7. Kruglov, M.G., Shishkov, G.M. Quality management as it is. Moscow: EKSMO, 2006. 539 p.
8. Hismatullina, Z.N. The evolution of higher education standards: from orientation on knowledge, skills and abilities to the assessment of competencies. Bulletin of the Technological University. 2013. Vol. 1. P. 397–401.
9. Zimnaya, I.A. General culture and socio-professional competence of a person. Higher education today. 2005. No. 11. P. 18–23.
10. Prudkovsky, B.A. Why does a metallurgist need mathematical models? Moscow: Nauka, 1989. 189 p.
11. Zimnaya, I.A. Key competencies as the effective-target basis of the competence approach in education. Moscow: Research Center for the quality of training specialists, 2004. 38 p.
12. Adler, Yu.P., Shper, V.L. Education in the XXI century: problems, prospects, solutions. Quality and life. 2015. No. 4. P. 37–45.
13. News of education and science. Alma mater (Vestnik vysshei shkoly). 2021. No. 12. P. 3–6.
14. Zhuk, I.N. Management: dictionary-reference. Moscow: Ankil, 2008. 1023 p.
15. Soloviev, V.P., Pereskokova, T.A. Higher education: realizing of crisis. Alma mater (Vestnik vysshei shkoly). 2019. No. 12. P. 6–14. DOI: 10.20339/AM.12-19.006
16. Karloff, B. Business strategy. Moscow: Economics, 1991. 237 c.
.png)
