UDC 37.07:005.94
https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.04-21.070
S.D. Reznik is Dr. Sci. (Economy), Prof., Head of sub-faculty “Management” e-mail: disser@bk.ru; and O.A. Sazykina is Cand. Sci. (Economy), Ass. Prof. at sub-faculty “Management” e-mail: soa02041978@bk.ru, both at Penza State University of Architecture and Construction
Generalized is experience of Penza State University of Architecture and Construction and of a number of other universities in the country in scientific methodological and organizational support of the state final certification of bachelors and undergraduates in the direction of training “Management”. This experience has been recognized by many higher educational institutions in Russia, and the presented approaches are recommended by the UMO of Russian universities for education in management for use in the state final certification of graduates of higher educational institutions. In addition, the article analyzes the problems that higher educational institutions have recently faced in connection with the pandemic, having to organize the educational process in a distance format. The practical implementation of the presented experience of the state final certification of graduates will contribute to improving the quality of theoretical and practical training of students at the final stages of study at universities, as well as ensuring an integrated approach to the final phases of state final certification and, as a result, increasing the effectiveness of training in higher educational institutions.
Key words: state final attestation, state exam, final qualifying work, distance learning, scientific, methodological and organizational support, management.
References
1. Abramov, R.N., Gruzdev, I.A., Terentyev, E.A., Zakharova, U.S., Grigorieva, A.V. University lecturers and digitalization of education: on the eve of distance force majeure. University management: practice and analysis. 2020. No. 2. P. 59–74.
2. Aleshkovsky, I.A., Gasparishvili, A.T., Krukhmaleva, O.V., Narbut, N.P., Savina, N.Ye. Students of Russian universities on distance learning: assessment and opportunities. Higher education in Russia. 2020. Vol. 29. No. 10. P. 86–100.
3. Aleshnikova, V.I., Akhmetshin, A.F., Basova, V.P. et al. Higher education in Russia: challenges of time and a look into the future. R.M. Nizhegorodtsev and S.D. Reznik (еds.). Moscow: INFRA-M, 2020. 610 p.
4. Arkhipova, T.G. State final certification in Russian universities in the 18th — early 21st century: a historical analysis. Teacher of the 21st century. 2020. No. 1–1. P. 19–37.
5. Bestaeva, N.V., Okladnikova, S.V. Information models of the process of organizing the final state certification at the university. Caspian journal: management and high technologies. 2020. No. 3 (51). P. 22–32.
6. Blokhin, I.N. Final state attestation in higher education: problems and prospects. Age of Information. 2016. No. 2. P. 307–309.
7. Bolshakova, A.S. Electronic educational resources as a pedagogical condition for the implementation of educational programs in a distance learning environment. Trends in the development of science and education. 2020. No. 636. P. 37–39.
8. Bondarchuk, M.M., Gryaznova E.V. Technologies for assessing learning outcomes in the course of state final attestation. Education and Science in Russia and Abroad. 2019. No. 4 (52). P. 94–100.
9. Gelman, V.Ya. Evaluation of final qualification works by state certifying commission. Alma mater (Vestnik vysshei shkoly). 2019. No. 2. P. 83–86. DOI: 10.20339/AM.01-19.083
10. Gorbunova, V.S. Transition to distance learning: pros and cons. Bulletin of the Russian New University. Series: Man in the Modern World. 2020. No. 3. P. 13–15.
11. Davydova, T.E. The specifics of the organization of the educational process at the university in non-standard conditions. Production organizer. 2020. Vol. 28. No. 2. P. 97–107.
12. Egorikhina, S.Yu., Mironenko E.S. Improvement of the state final attestation in higher education. Scientific journal Discourse. 2019. No. 11 (37). P. 18–28.
13. Kiseleva, T.Yu. Innovative digital solutions for improving the quality and optimization of the educational process in the context of adaptation after a pandemic. Innovations. The science. Education. 2020. No. 16. P. 299–305.
14. Kolomentseva, D.A. Proctoring of the state final certification (from the experience of TGPU n.a. L.N. Tolstoy). Bulletin of the Tula State University. Pedagogy. 2020. No. 3. P. 37–40.
15. Komarov, A.S., Kamshilov, S.G. Automated information systems for ensuring the state final certification: current state and development prospects. Society, Economics, Management. 2020. Vol. 5.No. 1. P. 61–69.
16. Kostina, I.B., Gladkikh, Yu.P. Distant learning and possibilities of information technologies as method of organization of modern educational process. Alma mater (Vestnik vysshei shkoly). 2019. No. 2. P. 53–55. DOI: 10.20339/AM.02-19.053
17. Maskina, O.G., Chuchkalova, E.I. Distance: normal flight! Vocational education and the labor market. 2020. No. 2. P. 80–81.
18. Petukhov, M.I., Dorogobed, A.N. Information system for recording the activities of a member of the state examination committee during the final certification of graduates. Information technologies in management and economics. 2019. No. 2 (15). P. 38–46.
19. Polyakova, M.V. Exercise in the distance: the first achievements and the first mistakes. International Journal of the Humanities and Natural Sciences. 2020. No. 8 (47). P. 59–65.
20. Skrypnikova, N.N. The future of education: total distance or total rejection of it? Vocational education and the labor market. 2020. No. 2. P. 58–59.
21. Stepanova, Yu.A., Guryeva, T.N. Digital means and technologies of distance education. Bulletin of the White General. 2020. No. 3. P. 110–116.
22. Management of higher education and science: experience, problems and prospects. R.M. Nizhegorodtsev and S.D. Reznik (еds.). Moscow: INFRA-M, 2015. 400 p.
.png)
