UDC 378(079)-044.3:004.04
https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.01-21.052
O.Ya. Kutsiy is senior lecturing at sub-faculty “Foubdry tecnologies”, Head of department for normative and methodological providing to educational process at Bauman Moscow State Technological University e-mail: kutsiy@bmstu.ru; and T.Yu. Tsibizova is Dr.Sci. (Pedagogy), Cand.Sci. (Philosophy), Ass. Prof. at sub-faculty “Systems of automatic management” at Bauman State Technological University, and Head of sub-faculty “Pedagogy, psychology, law, history and philosophy” at Mytishchi branch of Bauman Moscow State Technological University e-mail: mumc@bmstu.ru
Presented is analysis of issues of checking the final qualifying works for the amount of borrowed text and problems of controlling circumvention of this checking. Examined are some widely used ways methods to circumvent controlling in documents MS Word. Examined ways of circumvention were used for testing of fairly well-known plagiarism detection systems, such as Antiplagiat, TEXT.RU and RUKONTEXT.
Key words: final qualifying work, plagiarism, education, checking for the amount of borrowing, bypassing the check for the amount of borrowing.
References
1. Experience in using the methodology for assessing plagiarism in student works. Foundry. 2020. No. 11. P. 26–28.
2. Organization of checking final qualifying works for borrowing. Pedagogy and education. 2019. No. 3. P. 84–91.
3. Management of educational technologies of the Bauman Moscow State Technical University. URL: http://hoster.bmstu.ru/~det/ (accessed on 08.11.2020).
4. Antiplagiat as a system for online text checking for borrowings. URL: https://www.antiplagiat.ru/ (accessed on 09.08.2020).
5. Checking the text for uniqueness online. URL: https://text.ru/ (accessed on 09.20.2020).
6. Rukontext — anti-plagiarism, scientific search and analysis of documents. URL: https://text.rucont.ru/ (accessed on 09.11.2020).
7. Professional improvement of the uniqueness of the text. URL: https://killer-antiplagiat.ru/ (accessed on 09.08.2020).
.png)
