Ontologization of the object of cognition. Participation of truth

https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.02-19.025

M.A. Perekhoda is post-graduate at Orenburg State University e-mail: Marina.perehoda@mail.ru

Analyzed is the problem of search of new descriptive forms of cognition of necessity of inter-disciplinary researches and integration of modern knowledge and ontological reforming as to social-humanitarian cognition. Changing of place of paternalistic nature of relationship between the subject and the object of cognition, today an object centered installation comes into existence, that affirms self-sufficiency of the thing (object) in relation to the person (subject). Cardinally polar views of scientists of past centuries on research studies as to self-sufficient of the thing (object) as independent activity unit, phenomena of reality as it’s participant to real being, are analyzing in the article.

Key words: object of cognition, subject of cognition, truth, B. Latour, ontology.

References

1. Burbulis, Yu.V. (2015). Ontological turn in modern social theory: theoretical and methodological premises. Journal of Ural federal university. 2015. No. 4 (146). P. 53–65.
2. Burbulis, Yu.V. (2017). “Ontological turn” in modern social theory: theoretical and methodological premises . Ekaterinburg. P. 136.
3. Blur, D. (2017). Anti-Latur. Logos. No. 1 (116). P. 85–134.
4. Vakhshtain, V.S. (2007). Preface to B. Latour’s work “On interobjectivity”. Sociological Review. No. 1. P. 79.
5. Vakhshtain, V.S. (2017), Reassembly of daily routine: drones, elevators and project Pkm-1. Logos. No. 2 (117). P. 1–48.
6. Kopytoff, I. (2006). Cultural biography of things: composition as a process. In: Sociology of things. Moscow. P. 134–169.
7. Latur, B. (2017). On the actor-network theory. Some clarifications, supplemented by even greater complications. Logos. No. 1 (116). P. 173–200.
8. Latur, B. (2007). On the inter-objectivity. Sociological Review. No. 6 (2). P. 79–96.
9. Kharman, G. (2017). Networks and assemblages: the revival of things from Latour and Deland. Logos. No. 3. P. 1–34.
10. Latour, B., Yaneva, A. (2008). Give Me a Gun and I Will Make All Buildings Move. In: Explorations in Architecture. P. 80–89.
11. Law J. (2004). After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. L. Routledge.
12. Kasavin, I.T. The truth. URL: https://iphlib.ru/greenstone3/library/collection/newphilenc/document/HASHc976c26d4a176dfe58b2c9