Alma Mater
ISSN 1026-955X
Vestnik Vysshey Shkoly (Higher School Herald)
The best way to learn all about Higher Education


On differentiated structures of formation of modern personality

L.Kh. Urusova
80,00 ₽


L.Kh. Urusova is Cand.Sci. (Pedagogy), Senior lecturer at North-Caucasian Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of Krasnodar University of MVD of Russia e-mail:


Researched is problem of gender as bipolar phenomenon. Disclosed is essence of gender formation. Gender identity is the most important basic design, that combines masculine and feminine contrasts. The scale of gender identity of individual is built on the basis of gender stereotypes and gender roles. The nature of gender is conditioned by factors of socialization and cultural expectations of certain type of personality of a particular society. The gender identity of femininity and masculinity is rooted in social, rather than biological field. Gender changes directly depend on changes in social situation. Conclusion is made, that masculinity and femininity are not innate, but based on social and cultural conditions.

Key words: femininity, masculinity, personal identity, gender, personality formation, differentiated approach.



  1. Brushlinsky, A.V. The subject’s problem in psychological science. Psychological journal. 1991. No. 6. P. 3–11.
  2. Mead, M. Culture and the World of childhood. Moscow, 1988.
  3. Michel, W. Socially cognitive view on gender differences in behavior. In: Development of sexual differences. Stanford, 1966. P. 56–81.
  4. Rubinshtein, S.L. Fundamentals of general psychology. St. Petersburg, 2000.
  5. Urusova, L.Kh. Gender as an institution for socialization of the individual // Gaps in Russian legislation. 2017. No. 4. P. 258–260.
  6. Urusova, L.Kh. Cognitive theory of moral development L. Kolberg as condition for successful socialization of modern personality. Bulletin of East-Siberian state university of technology and management. 2016. No. 4 (61). P. 167–171.
  7. Freud, Z. About psychoanalysis. Five lectures. In: Reader on the history of psychology. Moscow, 1980. P. 148–184.