Transformation of social subject of modernity: on thr problem of methodology of cognition

https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.06-18.024

D.L. Shkarin is competitor at Chelyabinsk State University, Training Technologies Center Yekaterinburg

e-mail: dshkarin@mail.ru

Researched is the problem of modernizing of theoretical methodological instrumentarium of contemporary social philosophy. Analyzed is the problem of essence and specific of the process of transformation of social subject in speedy complicated social context of modernity with elaborating of tendencies of transformation process. On that fundament is being formed the system of notions, creating possibility of opening the process from content side, and then to separate productive (positive) transformational aspects from destructive (negative) ones as to the subject. Principal characteristics of complicated world are being compared with relevant qualities of social subject. In conclusion made are the author’s deductions about evolutionary process as a whole.

Key words: complexity, sociality, social philosophy, modernity, subject, individual personality, methodology, evolution, universality, formation, education.

References

1. Arrigi, J. Long twenties century. Money, power and origins of our time. Moscow, 2006.

2. Asmolov, A.G. Running for future. Povolzhie pedagogical search. 2017, no. 2 (20), pp. 60–66.

3. Akhiezer, A.S., Ryabova, M.E. Social philosophy in complicated world. Social sciences and modernity. 2005, no. 3, pp. 137–143.

4. Bauman, Z. Current modernity. St. Petersburg, 2008.

5. Ivaschtschuk, O.F. Incomprehensible Hegel and fraudulent exponent: collisions of development of contemporary science through the prism of institutionalized analysis. Social and humanitarian researches. 2016, no. 2 (8), pp. 5–11.

6. Kemerov, V.E. Subject as social construct. Development of the idea of subject. Sociemes. 2012, no. 20, pp. 22–37.

7. Koroleva, Yu.A. Flexibility as resource of vitality of modern personality. Social psychology and society. 2014, no. 1, pp. 5–14.

8. Kravchenko, S.A. Formation of complex society. On substantiation of humanistic theory of complexity. Moscow, 2012, p. 306.

9. Nazaretian, A.P. Non-linear future. Mega-historical, synergetic and culture psychological prerequisites of global prognostic. Moscow, 2013, pp. 249–250.

10. Nurgaleeva, L.V. Multi-rational and transversal. Projections of communicative ontology. Vestnik of Tomsk state university. 2013, no. 4 (24), pp. 117–123.

11. Opolev, P.V. Person under conditions of socio-cultural complexity. Ideas & Ideals. 2016, no. 3 (29), pp. 20–27.

12. Petrov, M.K. History of European cultural tradition and it’s problems. Moscow, 2004.

13. Petrov, M.K. Language. Sign. Culture. Moscow, 1991.

14. Rybin, V.A. Idea of university of 21^st century. Experience in research. Chelyabinsk, 2012.

15. Chukin, S.G. In search of lost unity: concept of transversal by Wolfgang Velsh. Vestnik of Leningrad state university n.a. A.S. Pushkin. 2010, pp. 57–64.

16. Bennett, N., Lemoine, G.J. What a difference a word makes: understanding threats to performance in a vuCA world. Business Horizons. 2014, no. 57 (3), pp. 311–317.