Determination of potential of student on the basis of data about result and psychological comfort of education

https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.08-17.037

I.S. Samokhin is Cand.Sci. (Philology), senior lecturer e-mail: alcrips85@mail.ru; M.G. Sergeyeva is Dr.Sci. (Pedagogy), doc. e-mail: sergeeva198262@mail.ru; and N.L. Sokolova is Cand. Sci. (Philology) doc., director of institute e-mail: oushkate@mail.ru

at Institute of Foreign Languages of Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Analyzed is individual potential of primary and secondary school students, described by terms widely used in scientific pedagogical community as “giftedness”, “talent” and “genius”. The aim of the article is to present corresponding phenomena as kinds of endowment, which is regarded by the authors as the highest capacity level of the student. Proposed is complex of pedagogical measures, which allow to determine capacity level of the student on current stage of educational process. Also described are functions of teacher and school psychologist, as well as factors, underlying leveled model of “educational productivity and emotional condition”. Developmental prospects of modernizing presented methodology with using of technical means. Also the authors reviewed approaches of Russian and foreign researchers to the problem of giftedness in broad sense of the word. Conclusion is made, that intellectual activity does not make provoke in gifted child negative emotions and needn’t from him serious willpower.

Key words: giftedness, ability, students, productivity, emotional condition. Emotions, levels of capacities.

References

1. Zinchenko, V.P., Meschtscheryakov, D.G. Complete psychological dictionary. Moscow, 2009.
2. Kondakov, I.M. Psychological dictionary. URL: http://2013lib.ru/dictionary/478/word/obschaja-odarenost
3. Golovin, S.Yu. Dictionary of practical psychologist. Moscow, 2001.
4. Working conception for giftedness. Moscow, 2003.
5. Panov, V.I. Gifted children: revealing, education, development. Pedagogy. 2001, no. 4, pp. 30-44.
6. Leytes, N.S. Psychology of giftedness of children and teenagers. Moscow, 1996.
7. Yurkevich, V.S. Gifted child: illusions & reality. Moscow, 2000.
8. Winner, E. Gifted Children: Myths and Realities. New York, 1997.
9. Adda, A., Catroux, H. L'enfant doué: L'intelligence réconciliée. Paris, 2003.
10. Heylighen F. Characteristics and Problems of the Gifted: neural propagation depth and flow motivation as a model of intelligence and creativity. URL: http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/papers/giftednessmodel.pdf
11. Urhahne, D., Ortiz, D.A. Motivation and Emotions of Gifted and Regular Students Performing a Creative Task. The Open Education Journal. 2011, no. 4, pp. 171–178.
12. Cross, T. Social Emotional Needs: Can the Obsessions of Gifted Students Be Positive Drivers in Their Development? Gifted Child Today. April, 2014, pp. 123–125.
13. Tan, L.S., Chun, K.Yu. N. Perfectionism and academic emotions in gifted adolescent girls. URL: https://repository.nie.edu.sg/bitstream/10497/17195/1/TAPER-23-3-389_a.pdf
14. Fatima, E.Z., Adwan, M.M. Cognitive and Emotional Needs of the Gifted Students From Themselves Perspective. URL: http://www.cscanada.net/index.php/css/article/view/6926
15. Farral, F., Henderson, L. Supporting your gifted and talented child’s achievement and well-being. URL: http://www.ais.sa.edu.au/__files/f/201292/2014%20Parent%20Booklet%20May%203pdf
16. Margrain, V., Murphy, C., Dean, J. Giftedness in the early years: Informing, learning & teaching. Wellington, 2015.
17. Neihart, M., Pfeiffer, S.I., Cross, T.L. The Social and Emotional Development of Gifted Children: What Do We Know? In: National Association for Gifted Children, 2016.
18. Piske, F.H.R., Stoltz, T., Machado, J. M., Vestena, C. L.B., Oliveira, C.S., Freitas, S.P., Machado, C.L. Working with Creativity of Gifted Students through Ludic Teaching. URL: http://file.scirp.org/Html/10-6303129_69157.htm
19. Gordeeva, T.O., Shepeleva, E.A. Internal and external educational motivation of academic successful school students. Vestnik of Moscow university. 2011, no. 3, pp. 33–45.
20. Yurkevich, V.S. On naïve and cultural creativity. In: Principal conceptions of creativity and giftedness. Moscow, 1997.
21. Bogoyavlenskaya, D.B., Bogoyavlenskaya, M.E. Psychological of giftedness: meaning, types, problems. Moscow, 2005.
22. Samokhin, I.S. Non-effective interest to studying at school age (reminiscent of supposing problem). Young scientist. 2015, no. 7 (87), pp. 856–859.
23. Samokhin, I.S. Pleasure from cognitive process as inalienable element of children’ giftedness. New university. 2015, no. 10 (55), pp. 4–9.
24. Samokhin, I.S. On the problem of subject discomfort of educational environment. Symbol of science. 2016, no. 4 (16), pp. 171–175.
25. Samokhin, I.S., Sokolova, N.L., Sergeeva, M.G. Results and comfort of education as principal criteria of it’s success. Scientific dialogue. 2016, no. 5 (53), pp. 234–253.
26. Minkin, A.V. Vibro-image. Sankt Petersburg, 2007.
27. Melnikova, A. On the scale of stress. — URL: http://novved.ru/zdorove/28628-po-shkale-stressa.html
28. Saveliev, S.V. Changeableness and genious. Moscow, 2012.
29. Saveliev, S.V. Non-natural selection. — URL: http://www.mk.ru/science/2012/04/25/697657-neestestvennyiy-otbor.html
30. Alferov, Zh.I. Response of each must be find By himself — URL: http://ileonardo.ru/2012/12/alferov/
31. Capria, M. Physics Before and After Einstein. IOS Press, Inc., 2005.
32. Kremer, V., Trenskler, G. Lexicon of popular delusions. Moscow, 2000.