Control as a tool for evaluation of quality of training of bachelors under conditions of transition onto Federal educational standards of the third generation

https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.01-17.059  

S.A. Mikheev is senior lecturer at Novosibirsk State University of Architecture & Civil Engineering

e-mail: omega1978@yandex.ru

Substantiated is necessity of revision of forms of realization of pedagogical controls under conditions of transition onto educational standards of generation “3” and “3+”. Given is detailed analysis of problems, caused by implementation into pedagogical process of new educational standards. So, shown are both advantages and disadvantages of different forms of pedagogical control. On the base of analysis of theoretical approaches, as well as on personal experience, the author proposes the concept of organizing of educational process with the use of five-step form of control. Presented are results of experimental work, confirming effectiveness of new forms of pedagogical control. Conclusion is made about productivity of using developed by the author form of pedagogical control for training bachelors under conditions of introduction new educational standards.

Key words: five step form of control, testing, pedagogical control, pedagogical process, subjective approach, educational standards, information technologies, competence approach.

References

1. Voytov, A.G. Testology for humanitarians. Theory and practice of educational testing. Moscow, 2005.
2. [URL]: http://www.vyatsu.ru/uploads/file/1402/gos27010265.pdf
3. Druzhilov, S.A. Two-leveled system of higher professional education: Western traditions and Russian reality. Pedagogy, 2010, no. 6, рр. 51–58.
4. [URL]: http://www.mmf.spbstu.ru/konf_2011/07.pdf
5. Mikheev, S.A. Problem of integration of computer testing traditional forms of pedagogical control. Higher education today, 2014, no. 5, pp. 66–69.
6. Mikheev, S.A. Testing as tool for studying of humanitarian disciplines. Philosophy of education, 2013, no. 2, pp. 97–103.
7. Pedagogy. Moscow, 1998.
8. Pedagogy. Moscow, 2000.
9. [URL]: http://www.edu.ru/db/mo/Data/d_15/m201.pdf
10. .Skibitsky, E.G. Distant education: theoretical methodological fundamentals. Novosibirsk, 2004.
11. [URL]: http://www.edu.ru/db/mo/Data/d_10/prm54-1.pdf