Research education in society of knowledge: cultural role, didactic principles, organization

A.O. Karpov is cand. of Science (Phys.-Math.), leading scientist at Bauman Moscow State Technical University

E-mail: a.o.karpov@gmail.com

Substantiated is cultural meaning of key role of research education in genesis of society of knowledge. Shown is the role of generative didactics as theory of research education in the process of formation of personality, capable for creating new knowledge, it’s technologization and integrating into socio-economic turnover. Identified and revealed are basic didactic principles of generative education. Also levels of organization of research education are considered, i.e. institutional, environmental and educational. Research educational stages are also described, i.e. involvement, construction of problem-cognitive program, and incorporation of student’s achievements into activities of society. Conclusion is made, that socially critical zone of modern culture are not so much high technologies and scientific innovations, but human nature, capable to develop in itself value conscious attitude towards formation of creative novation.

Key words: society of knowledge, education, scientific research, teaching, didactics.

 References

1. Mackenzie, J. Science Education after Рostmodernism //Education, Knowledge and Truth: Beyond the postmodern impasse.‒ London and New York, 1998. ‒ P. 53–67.

2. Harris, W.T. Vocation versus culture, or the two aspects of education // Education. ‒ 1891. ‒ Vol. XII. ‒ Р. 194–197.

3. Cubberley, E.P. Public school administration. ‒ Boston, 1916.

4. Botkin, J.W., Elmandjra, M., Malitza, M. No limits to Learning. Bridging the Human Gap. A Report to the Club of Rome. ‒ Oxford, 1999.

5. Doll, W.E. A Post-modern Perspective on Curriculum. ‒ New York and London, 1993.

6. Kraevsky V.V. Science of education & educational science (methodological problems of modern pedagogics) // Problems of Philosophy. ‒ M., 2009. ‒ P. 77–82.

7. Bruner, J.S. Science education and teachers: a Karplus Lecture // In Search of Pedagogy. Selected works of Jerome S. Bruner. ‒ London and New York, 2006. ‒ P. 150–159.

8. Burdier, P. Universal docsa and creativity: contra scholastic divisions. ‒ M., 1996. ‒ P. 8–31.

9. Mikeshina, L.A. Philosophy of condition. Polemic chapters. ‒ M., 2002.

10. Godon, R. Understanding, Personal Identity & Education // Journal of Philosophy of Education. ‒ 2004. ‒ Vol. 38. ‒ No. 4. ‒ P. 589–600.

11. English, A. Transformation and Education: the Voice of the Learner in Peters’ Concept of Teaching // Journal of Philosophy of Education. ‒ 2009. ‒ Vol. 43. ‒ No. 1. ‒ P. 75–95.

12. Hammershoj, L.G. Creativity as a Question of Bildung // Journal of Philosophy of Education. ‒ 2009. ‒ Vol. 43. ‒ No. 4. ‒ P. 545–557.

13. Bogoyavlenskaya, D. Two paradigms ‒ two vectors of creating the new // International journal of psychology. ‒ 2008. ‒ Vol. 1. ‒ P. 241–250.

14. Bogoyavlenskaya, D.B. Psychology of creative abilities. ‒ M., 2002.

15. Karpov, A.O. Locus of scientific talents: the program of “Step into the Future” // Vestnik RAN. ‒ 2012. ‒ Vol. 82. ‒ No. 8. ‒ P. 725–731.

16. Karpov, A.O. Education in society of knowledge: research model //Vestnik RAN. ‒ 2012. ‒ Vol. 82. ‒ No. 2. ‒ P. 146–152.

17. Developing Foresight for the Development of Higher Education/ Research Relations in the Perspective of the European Research Area (ERA) //Final Report of the Strata-Etan Expert Group. Brussels, 2002.

18. Karpov, A.O. Knowledge Society: A Weak Link // Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. ‒ N.-Y., 2010. ‒ Vol. 80. ‒ No. 4. ‒ P. 372–377.

19. Tomlinson, J. Policy and Governanse // Tomorrow’s Schools. ‒ London & New York, 2000. ‒ P. 153–166.

20. Karpov, A.O. Scientific cognition and system genesis of modern school //

Problems of philosophy. ‒ 2003. ‒ No. 6. ‒ P. 37–53.

21.

22. Collection of materials of “Step into future” exhibition and National competition of young scientists of the EU. ‒ M., 2002.

23. Gureev, A. Home Laser Appliance to Diagnose Cancer // 13th EU Contest for Young Scientists. ‒ Brussels-Oslo, 2001. ‒ P. 29.

24. Efimenko, A. My challenge to children’s mortality // 12th EU Contest for Young Scientists. ‒ Bergen, 2000. ‒ P. 83.

25. Obuschenko, A. Light-induced Particle Aggregation // 14th EU Contest for Young Scientists. ‒ Vienna, 2002. ‒ P. 30.

26. Gregorieva, V. How to make a profit from waste material // 12th EU Contest for Young Scientists. ‒ Bergen, 2000. ‒ P. 84.

27.Bakhulina, T. How to effeminate from oil? Astrakhan student invented unique preparation // Moscow news. ‒ 2001. ‒ No. 43.

28. The Role of the Universities in the Europe of Knowledge. ‒ Brussels, 2003.

29. Il’chenko, A. Not interesting is? // Research. ‒ 2011. ‒ No. 13. ‒ P. 2.

30. Pokholkov, Yu.P. Unfortuned, but it’s a fact. Thesis of world excellent Russian education is sounding today as unconvincing // Research. ‒ 2011. ‒ No. 10–11. ‒ P. 13.

31. Simons, M. «Education Through Research» at European Universities: Notes on the Orientation of Academic Research // Journal of Philosophy of Education. ‒ 2006. ‒ Vol. 40. ‒ No. 1. ‒ P. 31–50.