Anna V. Mayakova, Cand. Sc. (Philosophy), Scientific Researcher, South-West State University, Kursk Сity, e-mail: i@amajakova.ru
Social quality management today is an urgent area of research not only socio-economic, but also philosophical and humanitarian orientation. On the one hand, the undeniable novelty of social quality management generates a pluralism of opinions around it, on the other, the scientific and technical foundations of quality management dictate a clear logic and structuring of this process. The relevance of the topic is also confirmed by the fact that in the light of the interdisciplinarity of modern science, the issues of technicism and innovation are logically woven into the canvas of humanitarianism. The purpose of this study is to form a model of social quality management in the context of modern philosophy and methodology of science. To achieve this goal, the author uses such methods and methodologies as the theory of complexity (complexity), the concept of enactivism, the methodology of constructing parametric models and anthropological keys. The following results were obtained in the work. A parametric social model of quality management has been formed, which is a management system through the creation of conditions for the emergence of a new social quality of life. Social quality management is expressed in the emergence of a new social quality of life for a person (society) in a favorable environment formed by the quality mindset of a person (society). The presented model can be applied to social processes and clusters: from the direction (the chosen vector of development) to the result (the formation of a certain, and always new, social quality of life).
Keywords: social quality of life, social quality management, parametric model, quality-umwelt, complexity
References
1. Kamensky, E.G., Budanov, V.G., Arshinov, V.I., Aseeva, I.A. To substantiate the parametric model of sociocultural analysis of sociotechnical landscapes of digitalization. Complexity. Reason. Postneclassics. 2021. No. 3. P. 40–49
2. Stepin, V.S. Theoretical knowledge: Structure, historical evolution. Moscow: Progress-Tradition, 2003 (Lyubertsy (Moscow region): PIK VINITI). 743 p.
3. Budanov, V.G., Kamensky, E.G., Arshinov, V.I., Aseeva, I.A. Sociotechnical landscape in the conditions of digitalization: to the problem of concept and research methodology. Izvestiya South-West State University. Series of economics, sociology, law. 2019. V. 9. No. 3 (32). P. 213–225.
4. Sociotechnical landscape of digital reality: ethical and axiological regulators, adaptation mechanisms, sociotechnical models of digitalization management: monograph / ed. by I.A. Aseeva, V.G. Budanov. Kursk: Universitetskaya kniga, 2020. 302 p.
5. Mills, C.W. Sociological Imagination. Moscow: Izdat. House NOTA BENE, 2001. 265 p. (In Rus.)
6. Boldachev, A.V. Downward causality and the difficult problem of consciousness. LiveJournal. URL: https://consmind.livejournal.com/4777.html
7. Knyazeva, E.N. Enactivism: a new form of constructivism in epistemology. Moscow; St. Petersburg: Center for Humanitarian Initiatives: University Book, 2014. 352 p.
8. Uexküll, J. Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere. Berlin: Verlag von Julius Springer, 1909.
9. Knyazeva, E.N. The concept of ‘Umwelt’ by Jakob von Ixküll and its significance for modern epistemology. Voprosy philosophii. 2015. No. 5. P. 30–44.
10. Savenkov, A.I. Structure of social intelligence. Modern foreign psychology. 2018. V. 7. No. 2. P. 7–15.
11. Mayakova, A.V. Concept of socio-oriented qualitativism: basic postulates. Nauka. Society. State. 2023. No. 4 (44). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kontseptsiya-sotsioorientirovannogo-kv...
12. Mayakova, A.V. Model of social quality management in the system of state and municipal management. Region: systems, economy, management. 2023. No. 3 (62). P. 102–108.
13. Sociotechnical landscape of digital reality: ethical and axiological regulators, adaptation mechanisms, sociotechnical models of digitalization process management: a monograph / V.I. Arshinov, M.V. Artemenko, I.A. Aseeva [et al.]. Kursk: Universitetskaya kniga, 2020. 302 p.
14. Budanov, V.G., Kamensky, E.G., Arshinov, V.I., Aseeva, I.A. Anthropological keys of sociotechnical landscapes. Part 1: psychophysical and mental-spiritual aspects. Izvestia South-West State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management. 2020. V. 10. No. 4. P. 207-217.
15. Budanov, V.G., Kamensky, E.G., Arshinov, V.I., Aseeva, I.A. Anthropological keys of sociotechnical landscapes. Part 2: Socio-cultural and communicative aspects. Izvestia South-West State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management. 2020. V. 10. No. 6. P. 237–249.
16. Kompaniets, V.V., Pavlovich, G.L. About metaeconomics and spiritual reproduction. Visnik ekonomiki transportu i promyslovosti, 2011. No. 34. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/o-metaekonomike-i-duhovnom-vosproizvod...
.png)
