Shamil F. Farakhutdinov, Cand. Sc. (Sociology), Associate Professor, Senior Researcher, Institute for Problems of Northern Development, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Tyumen City, e-mail: fshamil@mail.ru
Konstantin V. Ambrushkevich, Postgraduate student of the Department of Marketing and Municipal Management, Tyumen Industrial University, Tyumen City, е-mail: ambrushkevichk@mail.ru
The article actualizes the problem of perception of entrepreneurship in the public consciousness of student youth. The importance of forming a positive attitude to this type of activity for the socio-economic system of the country is noted. Theoretical and methodological prerequisites for studying the status of an entrepreneur are considered. A secondary analysis of data was carried out, during which the results of large domestic research centers on a national sample were considered. The results of the author’s sociological study are presented, including a survey of students of universities in Tyumen and a series of interviews with active young entrepreneurs. A conclusion is made about the positive perception of entrepreneurs by modern youth and the need to continue state activities to develop entrepreneurship.
Keywords: social status, youth, students, entrepreneurship, business, social mobility
The work was carried out under the state assignment of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (No. FWRZ-2021-0006)
References
1. Aripov, O.A. Structural elements of the business environment and their impact on the functioning of small businesses and entrepreneurship. Regional problems of economic transformation. 2019. No. 8 (106). P. 184–191.
2. Vasilyeva, L.V. Entrepreneurship in the public opinion of Russians. Sociology. 2020. No. 2. P. 198–204.
3. Galoy, N.Yu. Psychology of life path of businesswomen. Vestnik of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2008. No. 12. P. 6–8.
4. Zakharova, N.V. Small and medium-sized entrepreneurship in developed countries: the main features of development. Vestnik RGGU. Series “Economics. Management. Law”. 2020. No. 4. P. 88–102.
5. National report “Global Entrepreneurship Monitoring” / O.R. Verkhovskaya, K.A. Bogatyreva, M.V. Dorokhina [et al.]. St. Petersburg: Graduate School of Management St. Petersburg State University, 2018. 100 p.
6. “Is it time to take action?” — review of the monitoring study / VCIOM. URL: https://wciom.ru/analytical-reviews/analiticheskii-obzor/pora-predprinim... (accessed on: 07.11.2024).
7. Rubin, Yu.B. Theory of entrepreneurship: the space of functional approach. Modern competition. 2018. No. 1 (67). P. 83–103.
8. Seletkova, G.I., Lazukova, E.A. Sociological analysis of the social status of entrepreneurs and managers (by the example of Perm Krai). Vestnik PNIPU. Socio-economic sciences. 2016. No. 3. P. 147–155.
9. Svinova, E. Experts explained why the share of business in Russia is inferior to the economies of Europe and Asia (material from 07.02.2024). Rossiyskaya Gazeta. URL: https://rg.ru/2024/02/07/eksperty-obiasnili-pochemu-v-rossii-dolia-bizne... (accessed on: 07.11.2024).
10. Smith, A. Research on the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Moscow: Sotsekgiz, 1962. 684 p.
11. Filatov, V.P. Human models in social sciences. Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. 2012. Vol. XXXI. No. 1. P. 125–140.
12. 25 million Russians would like to try themselves in entrepreneurship / NAFI: National Agency for Financial Research: website. URL: https://nafi.ru/analytics/25-millionov-rossiyan-khoteli-by-poprobovat-se... (accessed on: 07.11.2024).
.png)
