UDC 016:001(05)-043.8/.9:614.4
https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.05-22.084
Marina L. Zaitseva, Dr. Sci. (Arts), Ph.D. (Philosophy), Professor of Department of Musicology at Kosygin State University of Russia, Moscow, ORCID: 0000-0001-6255-500X, е-mail: zajtseva-ml@rguk.ru
Mariya N. Girnik, Educator of the Clinical Pshychology and Integrative Art-Therapy Faculty at Kosygin State University of Russia, Moscow, e-mail: girnik-mn@rguk.ru
The purpose of the article is to problematize the study of COVID-factors of the constitution of social reality in scientific discussions. The object of the study is the theoretical discourse on the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, represented by a set of scientific publications eLIBRARY, Publons, Mendeley, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, Sage, Springer, Taylor & Francis, Wiley. This choice is due to the openness of the data: the studied segment of scientific texts did not pass the selection of scientometric optics, remaining part of the social discourse. This is important because the authors focus on the COVID-factors of the constitution of social reality.
The study is supported by general theoretical methods of typology and comparison. Mathematical methods of statistical data processing were used as instrumental ones.
In the logic of the study, it can be argued that the high degree of subjectivation of COVID-factors for the constitution of social reality in Russia implies in the future a greater adaptability of society to such shocks, since the degree of subjectivation of the threat is associated with the degree of further objectification of the constitutive foundations of social development. In particular, a feature of the domestic scientific discourse has been established, expressed by a significant increase in publications with the attribute “COVID” in 2020–2021, compared with such traditional attributes of social discourse as: “economy”, “education”, “culture”, “politics”.
Key words: social discourse, theoretical discourse, constitution of social reality, COVID-factors, statistics, typology, comparison.
References
1. Ananchenkova, P.I., Novikova, N.M. Dys-functionality of education in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Alma mater (Vestnik vysshei shkoly). 2020. No. 11. P. 7–11. DOI: 10.20339/AM.11-20.007
2. Gelman, V.Ya. Problems of transition to distance learning. Alma mater (Vestnik vysshei shkoly). 2020. No. 7. P. 8–12. DOI: 10.20339/AM.07-20.008
3. Grachev, V.A. V.I. Vernadsky’s doctrine of noosphere as the basis of sustainable development. South of Russia: Ecology, Development. 2015. No. 3. P. 16–23.
4. Didurenko, L.P. COVID-19: challenge and philosophy of response. In: “Challenge” in everyday life of Russia’s population: history and modernity: proceedings of international scientific conference. V.A. Veremenko (ed.) (Saint Petersburg, 1–3 April 2021). St. Petersburg: Pushkin Leningrad State University, 2021. P. 66–71.
5. Zhukov, V.N. What does the pandemic in Russia show? Alma mater (Vestnik vysshei shkoly). 2022. No. 1. P. 100–101. DOI: 10.20339/AM.01-22.100
6. Zhuravleva, I.A. Students’ perception of distance learning at university. Alma mater (Vestnik vysshei shkoly). 2020. No. 8. P. 12–15. DOI: 10.20339/AM.08-20.012
7. Zorin, K.V. Medical education under conditions of pandemic of coronavirus infection: social and ethical recommendations. Alma mater (Vestnik vysshei shkoly). 2021. No. 2. P. 38–41. DOI: 10.20339/AM.02-21.038
8. Zorin, K.V. Social and Ethical problems of Vaccination against COVID-19. Alma mater (Vestnik vysshei shkoly). 2022. No. 1. P. 102–105. DOI: 10.20339/AM.01-22.102
9. Karepova, S.G., Kostolomova, M.V. “Post-quarantine” social reality: contours and contradictions. Alma mater (Vestnik vysshei shkoly). 2021. No. 12. P. 23–29. DOI: 10.20339/AM.12-21.023
10. Karpov, A. Fundamental Models of Future Education. Voprosy philosofii. 2022. No. 1. P. 54–64.
11. Kozlov, S.V. Problem of Society Self-Elegitimization in the Context of Modernization and Postmodernization Processes: Socio-Philosophical Aspects. Vestnik of Tver State University. Series: Philosophy. 2021. No. 1 (55). P. 17–30.
12. Komarov, V.V., Litvina, N.I., Ananiev, E.V., Pronchenko, L.V. The world economy. The corona virus pandemic. Unprecedented risks and uncertainties. Alma mater (Vestnik vysshei shkoly). 2021. No. 5. P. 109–116. DOI: 10.20339/AM.05-21.109
13. Kotlyarova, V.V., Kireeva, L.E. Types of fears and self-regulation of student behavior in the situation of forced self-isolation. Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogy. 2020. No. 7. P. 70–76.
14. Larionova, M.V., Kirton, J. Global governance after the crisis COVID-19. Bulletin of international organizations: education, science, new economy. 2020. No. 2. P. 7–23.
15. Levashev V.K., Shushpanov I.S., Anishchenko A.V. State measures and researches to support Russian entrepreneurship in the context of COVID-crisis. Alma mater (Vestnik vysshei shkoly). 2020. No. 11. P. 92–102. DOI: 10.20339/AM.11-20.092
16. Lobanova, N.I., Logunova, L.V. Distance learning under conditions of pandemic (example of V.P. Astafiev Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University). Alma mater (Vestnik vysshei shkoly). 2021. No. 5. P. 40–44. DOI: 10.20339/AM.05-21.040
17. Momjyan, K.Kh. On the Construction of Social Reality. Philosophical Journal. 2021. No. 4. P. 38–52.
18. Nestik, T.A., Zadorin, I.V. The attitude of Russians to global risks: socio-demographic and psychological factors of threat perception. Monitoring. 2020. No. 5 (159). P. 4–28.
19. North, D. Institutes, Institutional Change and the Functioning of the Economy / Translated from English by A.N. Nesterenko; ed. and preface by B.Z. Milner. Moscow: Foundation of Economic Books “Beginnings”, 1997. 180 p.
20. Osipova, E.D. The Transformation of Social Practices: the concept of P. Berger and T. Luckman in a Crisis-Society. Vestnik RUDN. Series: Sociology. 2015. No. 2. P. 69–79.
21. Polyakov A.V., Unusyan U.V. Sociological aspects of safety assessment at the organizational level (on the example of pre-schools). Vestnik RUDN. Series: Sociology. 2020. No. 1. P. 124–136.
22. Smirnov, G.S. Philosophy of Autotrophic Humanity and Global Consciousness. Century of Globalization. 2017. No. 1 (21). P. 20–32.
23. Sorokin, M.Y., Kasyanov, E.D., Rukavishnikov, G.V., [et al.] Structure of anxiety experiences associated with the spread of COVID-19: data from an online survey. Vestnik RGMU. 2020. No. 3. P. 77–84.
24. Stepin, V.S., Smirnova, N.M., Sineokaya, Y.V. Is there a methodological isomorphism of natural-science and social-humanitarian knowledge? Philosophical Journal. 2018. Т. 11. No. 3. P. 150–165.
25. Talanov, S.L., Kushnarev, F.Yu., Berezin, D.T., Rumyantseva, E.S. Impact of COVID-19 on the system of higher education. Alma mater (Vestnik vysshei shkoly). 2020. No. 10. P. 12–22. DOI: 10.20339/AM.10-20.012
26. Urusova, L.Kh. The Modern education in the period of pandemic: problems and their solutions. Alma mater (Vestnik vysshei shkoly). 2021. No. 3. P. 50–54. DOI: 10.20339/AM.03-21.050
27. Fesenkova, L. Doctrine of noosphere in modern ecological situation. Higher education in Russia. 2008. No. 1. P. 142–147.
28. Harman, G. Immaterialism: Objects and Social Theory / Transl. from English by A. Pisarev; E. Popova (ed.). Moscow: Gaidar Institute, 2018. 152 p.
29. Humanity in the New Reality: Global Biotechnological Challenges. U.L. Belkina, M.I. Frolova (eds.). Moscow: CANON+, 2022. 496 p.
30 Critical Zones: The Science and Politics of Landing on Earth. B. Latour, P. Weibel (eds.). Cambridge; London: MIT Press, 2020. 560 p.
31. Latur, B. After Lockdown: A Metamorphosis / Transl. J. Rose. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2021. 180 p.
32. Latur, B. Ecological Mutation and Christian Cosmology: A lecture for the International Congress of the European Society for Catholic Theology (Osnabrück, August 2021) / Transl. S. Ferguson [Online]. URL: http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/177-OSNABRUCK-GB.pdf (accessed on: 28.01.2022).
34. Lee, M.M. Covid-19: Agnotology, Inequality, and Leadership. Human Resource Development International. 2020. Vol. 23. Iss. 4. P. 333–346.
.png)
