https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.12-18.010
D.D. Reprintsev is Cand.Sci. (Technics), prof.; and S.V. Pisareva is Cand.Sci. (Physics & Mathematic), doc. at Voronezh State University of Forestry and Technologies n.a. G.F. Morozov e-mail: pisareva_s@mail.ru
Substantiated is value of lecture as principal method of training of students and leading form for organization of educational process. Analyzed are reasons, results of traditional lecture. As to raising of quality of lecture, proposed is inclusion in it’s structure elements of interactive interaction of both lecturer and students. Shown is the role of lecturer in contemporary educational breeding process. Also actualized is necessity of evaluation of quality of lectures, teaching to students, as well as described is experience of using methodic of such evaluation.
Key words: university’s lecture, giving lectures, lecturer, lecturer’s mastership, cognitive activity of students, evaluation of quality of knowledge.
References
1. FZ “On education in the Russian Federation”.
2. Gaponov, P.M. Lecture in higher school. Voronezh, 1977.
3. Kadmensky, S.G. Humanitarian training of future specialist. Voronezh, 2010. P. 88–93.
4. Rakhmanin, V.S. The goal is scientific and activity culture of professional thinking. In: University lecture from the first person. Voronezh, 2010. P. 32–40.
5. Polupan, K.A. Reconstruction of activity of lecturer of university. Higher education in Russia. 2017. No. 2. P. 21–45.
6. Titova, S.V. Model of interactive lesson on the base of mobile technologies. Higher education in Russia. 2015. No. 2. P. 126–135.
7. Ilina, M.A. Creteria for evaluation of quality of labor of lecturer. Guarantees of quality fo professional education. Barnaul, 2010. P. 306–308.
8. Dremova, N.B. Formation of professional mastership in lecturer at university. Higher education in Russia. 2015. No. 1. P. 127–132.
9. Shageeva, F.T. Pedagogical mastership of lecturer at engineering university: ways for improvement. Higher education in Russia. 2017. No. 10. P. 88–93.
.png)
