Formation of cognitive activity in the process of training igrofication

https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.06-17.045

A.M. Bessmertny is competitor for scientific degree e-mail: bes.am@mail.ru; and I.V. Gaenkova is Cand.Sci. (Pedagogy), doc.  e-mail: ysetiont@mail.ru

at Technological Institute of North-Eastern Federal University

Analyzed is the meaning of the concept of “igrofication” from positions of modern technological resource, which allows to use in total all already known pedagogical technologies, and also to organize the process of formation of cognitive activity of students, brought closer to cogitative operations of the person. Disclosed are possibilities of elaborations in development of training computer games, oriented on using by students in the process of training universal cognitive schemes, such as “part – whole”, “communication”, making a basis for generalization and categorization of training material. The aim of the article is in research of opportunities of forming of cognitive activity of trainees in the environment of game electronic platforms. The authors presented for discussion experimental variant of electronic training game of “Formulate new concept”.

Key words: igrofication, cognitive activity, cognitive schemes in training.

References

1. Avdonina, E.L. Cognitive activity of students in different models of training: Author’s abstr. diss. (Cand. Psychol. Sci.). St. Petersburg, 2006.

2. Bessmertny, A.M., Gayenkova, I.V. Philosophical bases of game in the aspect of changes of cultures and social practices of society. News of Volgograd pedagogical university. 2015, no. 7 (102), pp. 4–9.

3. Vasilyuk, F.E. Methodological sense of psychological skhizis. Problems of Psychology. 1996, no. 6, pp. 25–40.

4. Voyskunsky, A.E., Avetisova, A.A. About psychological diagnostics of game and educational Internet resources (on material of resources for pre-school children). In: Public transformations and cyberspace: inter-disciplinary researches. Saint Petersburg, 2009, pp. 132–151.

5. Cole, M. Cultural and historical psychology. Future science. Moscow, 1997, p. 68.

6. Kruk, Ch. Schools of the future. In: Humanitarian researches on the Internet. Moscow, 2000, pp. 314–332.

7. Logvinov, I.N., Sarychev, S.V., Silakov, A.S. Pedagogical psychology in schemes and comments. St. Petersburg, 2005, p. 45.

8. Nevolin, I.F. Informative reading as leading form of life-long education. In: Anthology of pedagogical psychology. Moscow, 1995, pp. 105–109.

9. Radchikova, N.P., Repeko, A.P. Structure of semantic memory: research of dynamics basic level. Problems of Psychology. 2002, no. 3, pp. 99–110.

10. Stukolova, E.A. Possibilities of application of innovative models of school education of foreign countries in the course of upgrade of the Russian education system. In: Science and the present: collection of articles. Ufa, 2015, pp. 176–180.

11. Talyzina, N.F. General analysis of educational process. In: Anthology of pedagogical psychology. Moscow, 1995, pp. 31–44.

12. Kholodnaya, M.A. Psychology of the intellect. St. Petersburg, 2002.