Specifics of the Reflection of Professional and Educational Activities by University Actors in the Process of Digitalization of the Educational Space

UDC 378-042.4:004+316.6

https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.12-22.028

Yana. I. Serkina, Cand. Sc. (Sociology), Docent, Associate Professor in the Department of Management and Marketing at Belgorod State National Research University, ORCHID ID 0000-0002-5106-7104, e-mail: serkina_ya@bsu.edu.ru

The article considers specific circumstances reflecting the reflection of the main actors of the educational space of a higher educational institution (administrative staff, teachers and researchers, students) of professional and educational activities. The conditions under which the reflection of professional and educational activities in the risky environment of digitalization of the educational space can be the most complete and adequate are determined.

Key words: educational space, digitalization, reflection, risk, actor, university.

References

1. Barnett, R. Understanding the University. Alma mater (Vestnik vysshey shkoly). 2008. No. 6. P. 46–57.

2. Dutko, Yu.A, Belovol, E.V. Features of the formation of personality thinking in the digital environment (comparative analysis of generations). Scientific result. Pedagogy and psychology of education. 2020. Vol. 6. No. 1. P. 78–92.

3. Castells, M. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture / transl. from Eng. Moscow: Higher School of Economics, 2000. 458 p.

4. Kudryavtsev, D.I. Resources for overcoming resistance to managerial innovations in a university organization. Theory and practice of social development. 2011. No. 1. P. 93–99.

5. Masalova, Yu.A. Digital competence of teachers of Russian universities. University management: practice and analysis. 2021. Vol. 25. No. 3. P. 33–44.

6. Perfileva, O.V. The problem of the digital divide and international initiatives to overcome it. Vestnik of International Organizations. 2007. № 2 (10). P. 34–48.

7. The project of the didactic concept of digital vocational education and training. Moscow: Pero. 2019. 72 p.

8. Reznik, Yu.M., Smirnov, E.A. Personal life strategies (experience of complex analysis): monograph. Moscow, 2002. 259 p.

9. Seliverstova, N.A. Imitation of educational practices in the field of higher education. Sociological research. 2020. No. 3. P. 71–77.

10. Tikhonov, A.V., Bogdanov, V.S. From “smart regulation” to “smart management”: the social problem of digitalization of feedback. Sociological research. 2020. No. 1. P. 74–81.

11. Usacheva, O.V., Chernyakov, M.K. Assessment of the readiness of universities to transition to a digital educational environment. Higher education in Russia. 2020. Vol. 29. No. 5. P. 53–62.

12. Firsova, S.V., Danilina, O.M., Dashkov, A.A., Pokazanyev, V.Yu. Culture as an attribute of digital transformation. Digital Sociology. 2021. Vol. 4. No. 1. P. 4–11.

13. Sharifyanov, T.F., Gainanov, D.A. Evolution of digital inequality and tools for neutralizing its consequences. Regional economic theory and practice. 2014. No. 22 (349). P. 2–18.